Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumSpaceX Grasshopper Software First - 325m Test
Published on Jul 5, 2013
On June 14, SpaceX's Grasshopper flew 325 m (1066 feet)--higher than Manhattan's Chrysler Building--before smoothly landing back on the pad. For the first time in this test, Grasshopper made use of its full navigation sensor suite with the F9-R closed loop control flight algorithms to accomplish a precision landing. Most rockets are equipped with sensors to determine position, but these sensors are generally not accurate enough to accomplish the type of precision landing necessary with Grasshopper.
Previous Grasshopper tests relied on the other rocket sensors but for this test, an additional, higher accuracy sensor was in the control loop. In other words, SpaceX was directly controlling the vehicle based on new sensor readings, adding a new level of accuracy in sensing the distance between Grasshopper and the ground, enabling a more precise landing.
Grasshopper is a 10-story Vertical Takeoff Vertical Landing (VTVL) vehicle designed to test the technologies needed to return a rocket back to Earth intact. While most rockets are designed to burn up on atmosphere reentry, SpaceX rockets are being designed not only to withstand reentry, but also to return to the launch pad for a vertical landing. The Grasshopper VTVL vehicle represents a critical step towards this goal.
Grasshopper consists of a Falcon 9 rocket first stage tank, Merlin 1D engine, four steel and aluminum landing legs with hydraulic dampers, and a steel support structure.
On June 14, SpaceX's Grasshopper flew 325 m (1066 feet)--higher than Manhattan's Chrysler Building--before smoothly landing back on the pad. For the first time in this test, Grasshopper made use of its full navigation sensor suite with the F9-R closed loop control flight algorithms to accomplish a precision landing. Most rockets are equipped with sensors to determine position, but these sensors are generally not accurate enough to accomplish the type of precision landing necessary with Grasshopper.
Previous Grasshopper tests relied on the other rocket sensors but for this test, an additional, higher accuracy sensor was in the control loop. In other words, SpaceX was directly controlling the vehicle based on new sensor readings, adding a new level of accuracy in sensing the distance between Grasshopper and the ground, enabling a more precise landing.
Grasshopper is a 10-story Vertical Takeoff Vertical Landing (VTVL) vehicle designed to test the technologies needed to return a rocket back to Earth intact. While most rockets are designed to burn up on atmosphere reentry, SpaceX rockets are being designed not only to withstand reentry, but also to return to the launch pad for a vertical landing. The Grasshopper VTVL vehicle represents a critical step towards this goal.
Grasshopper consists of a Falcon 9 rocket first stage tank, Merlin 1D engine, four steel and aluminum landing legs with hydraulic dampers, and a steel support structure.
Via http://nasawatch.com/archives/2013/07/spacex-grasshop-1.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2171 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SpaceX Grasshopper Software First - 325m Test (Original Post)
bananas
Jul 2013
OP
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)1. That was cool.
It doesn't look like it's 10 stories tall.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)2. Classic 1950s scifi type landing.
great! Can I leave? Don't need to come back.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)4. so what Musk is helping with...
...in his Tesla line regarding climate change, he's making up for with this and other CO2 belchers?
bananas
(27,509 posts)5. Not even close.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071117051020AAXmiOQ
What Kind of Pollution Comes From the Space Shuttle At Launch?
Looks pretty nasty. Where's the EPA when you need them!
6 years ago
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
According to the December 2007 issue of Discover magazine,
"... a single NASA space shuttle launch produces 28 tons of carbon dioxide ..."
However, with only two shuttle launches a year, that's not a large number. The operation of the Kennedy Space Center is where the big polution numbers pop up ...
" ... 23 tons of harmful particulate matter settle around the launch area each liftoff, and nearly 13 tons of hydrochloric acid kill fish and plants within half a mile of the site ... the environmental cost per launch is the same as that of New York City over a weekend ..."
"Still, the expected impact of spaceflight pales in comparison with the carbon footprint of a commercial airport. Los Angeles International Airport has carbon dioxide emissions of nearly 19,000 tons a month ... and the 33,000 airplanes that fly in and out of the airport each month emit about 800,000 tons of carbon dioxide."
Source(s):
"Discover" magazine, December 2007 special issue, page 21, "A Spaceport for Tree Huggers".
6 years ago
What Kind of Pollution Comes From the Space Shuttle At Launch?
Looks pretty nasty. Where's the EPA when you need them!
6 years ago
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
According to the December 2007 issue of Discover magazine,
"... a single NASA space shuttle launch produces 28 tons of carbon dioxide ..."
However, with only two shuttle launches a year, that's not a large number. The operation of the Kennedy Space Center is where the big polution numbers pop up ...
" ... 23 tons of harmful particulate matter settle around the launch area each liftoff, and nearly 13 tons of hydrochloric acid kill fish and plants within half a mile of the site ... the environmental cost per launch is the same as that of New York City over a weekend ..."
"Still, the expected impact of spaceflight pales in comparison with the carbon footprint of a commercial airport. Los Angeles International Airport has carbon dioxide emissions of nearly 19,000 tons a month ... and the 33,000 airplanes that fly in and out of the airport each month emit about 800,000 tons of carbon dioxide."
Source(s):
"Discover" magazine, December 2007 special issue, page 21, "A Spaceport for Tree Huggers".
6 years ago
DhhD
(4,695 posts)6. Looks like a flight in to space along and back down a carbon tube or ladder, could deliver people
and freight back and forth to the Moon by docking and undocking as the Earth and Moon move in their revolutions. A Moon colony is inevitable.