Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Obama and Bush Should be Arrested With Snowden (Original Post) votesparks Jul 2013 OP
And a Happy Fourth of July to you! classof56 Jul 2013 #1
You mean votesparks Jul 2013 #2
No happy 4th of you lie nineteen50 Jul 2013 #4
Excerpts from the New York Times article discussed: RufusTFirefly Jul 2013 #3
Does the 14th Amendment provide due process BEFORE a Passport can be removed from DhhD Jul 2013 #5
K&R Waiting For Everyman Jul 2013 #6
Obama a "constitutional Lawyer"? yea so is Bush. It hit me after all bonniebgood Jul 2013 #7
Oh, don't worry mikeypooh Jul 2013 #9
Mikeypooh thanks for the links very interesting. I really was refering to the bonniebgood Jul 2013 #14
We need to get on the ball people .. 02potato Jul 2013 #8
Will be at the action votesparks Jul 2013 #10
Spying SamKnause Jul 2013 #11
So, every American President back to the beginning of time should be arrested then? baldguy Jul 2013 #12
Yep. As unreal as it looks like. Amonester Jul 2013 #13
Why that's precisely what it says. Congratulations for being so astute!! RufusTFirefly Jul 2013 #16
15. You want Obama/Biden to be impeached and replaced by Amonester Jul 2013 #19
Thank heaven the rule of law applies only to people we don't like! RufusTFirefly Jul 2013 #20
pff Amonester Jul 2013 #21
Racist Paulbot! burnodo Jul 2013 #15
Voted twice for Obama votesparks Jul 2013 #17
Perhaps we should raise the question . . . Jack Rabbit Jul 2013 #22
Small world onlyadream Jul 2013 #18

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
3. Excerpts from the New York Times article discussed:
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 09:32 AM
Jul 2013
The Fourth Amendment obliges the government to demonstrate probable cause before conducting invasive surveillance. There is simply no precedent under the Constitution for the government’s seizing such vast amounts of revealing data on innocent Americans’ communications.

The government has made a mockery of that protection by relying on select Supreme Court cases, decided before the era of the public Internet and cellphones, to argue that citizens have no expectation of privacy in either phone metadata or in e-mails or other private electronic messages that it stores with third parties.

...

We may never know all the details of the mass surveillance programs, but we know this: The administration has justified them through abuse of language, intentional evasion of statutory protections, secret, unreviewable investigative procedures and constitutional arguments that make a mockery of the government’s professed concern with protecting Americans’ privacy. It’s time to call the N.S.A.’s mass surveillance programs what they are: criminal.


"The Criminal N.S.A." a New York Times op-ed, written by a couple of obvious hacks from obscure law schools. Jennifer Stisa Granick is the director of civil liberties at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society. Christopher Jon Sprigman is a professor at the University of Virginia School of Law.

bonniebgood

(943 posts)
7. Obama a "constitutional Lawyer"? yea so is Bush. It hit me after all
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 10:15 AM
Jul 2013

the NSA and Snowden information came out to the REAL REASON why congress, our Gov
is trying to kill/abolish the Post Office. The Post Office is the last shred of Privacy we have. It is
still a felony to 'tamper with the US Mail'. If the post office becomes private and run by
a corporation then there won't be a law called "tampering with the US Mail".

So, if you want to say something private to your Grandma you had better lick a .45 stamp
and envelope and send it by the US Mail.
Say Hello to snail mail.

bonniebgood

(943 posts)
14. Mikeypooh thanks for the links very interesting. I really was refering to the
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jul 2013

contents of the letter. To and from "cover of envelope" are not meant or expected to be "private". Envelope addresses, mainly by zip codes, are scanned by machines in order to reach it's destination. Zip codes carry all the information, State, City, to Carrier route. The contents however, is another story. Its still illegal on its face for any agency to 'open and scan' your contents into a data base anywhere the same way your voice and email is openly recorded.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
13. Yep. As unreal as it looks like.
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jul 2013

I'm afraid we'll all end up stuck with a pRe$ident oRangeman and vice-pRe$ident can'toR in about two years from now.

Or maybe they will be busted too?


RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
16. Why that's precisely what it says. Congratulations for being so astute!!
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 12:45 PM
Jul 2013

You've used No. 1 from the Official Distractivist Playbook and may qualify for membership in the Logical Fallacy Hall of Fame. (Void where prohibited.) Come on down and accept your bright and shiny Distractivist medal!!

The Official Distractivist Talking Points*

1. This is nothing new
2. I have nothing to hide
3. What are you, a freeper?
4. But Obama is better than Christie/Romney/Bush/Hitler
5. Greenwald/Flaherty/Gillum/Apuzzo/Braun is a hack
6. We have red light cameras, so this is no big deal
7. Corporations have my data anyway
8. At least Obama is trying
9. This is just the media trying to take Obama down
10. It's a misunderstanding/you are confused
11. You're a racist
12. Nobody cares about this anyway / "unfounded fears"
13. I don't like Snowden, therefore we must disregard all of this
14. Other countries do it

* A tip of the hat to PSPS, from whom I got the original list.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
19. 15. You want Obama/Biden to be impeached and replaced by
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 01:06 PM
Jul 2013

1. oRangeman/can'toR

2. oRangeman/tuRtleman

3. ?

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
21. pff
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 02:03 PM
Jul 2013

Good luck to our progressive goals if any of these cReepy tearorists enter the WH by the back door, since I can't tank something I don't believe in.

votesparks

(1,288 posts)
17. Voted twice for Obama
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 12:51 PM
Jul 2013

and have been an elected union leader working for progressive causes. Hardly (while acknowledging your sarcasm).

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
22. Perhaps we should raise the question . . .
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 02:51 PM
Jul 2013

. . . if opposing Obama over NSA spying is racism, is going after Glen Greenwald over exposing it homophobia?

No, we'll just let the Rahm Emanuel Marching Bank look silly without stooping to their level.

onlyadream

(2,166 posts)
18. Small world
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 12:59 PM
Jul 2013

I knew Professor Christopher Sprigman in HS (and junior HS), he actually went to the prom with Soledad O'Brian, both in my class of '84, lol.

To drop another name, in 7th grade, Chris starred in My Fair Lady, where he played Professor Higgins, where he played opposite the now well known author, Jodi Picoult, who was Eliza. Both did a tremendous job, I might add.

Some well known people came out of my grade

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Why Obama and Bush Should...