Publisher Targets University Researchers for "Pirating" Their Own Articles
Publisher Targets University Researchers for Pirating Their Own Articles
By Ernesto on May 16, 2014
The American Society of Civil Engineers is cracking down on researchers who post their own articles on their personal websites. The publisher, which owns dozens of highly cited journals, claims that the authors commit copyright infringement by sharing their work in public.
<snip>
While many journals allow this type of limited non-commercial infringement by the authors, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) clearly doesnt. The professional association publishes dozens of journals and during the past few weeks began a crack down on pirating researchers.
The publisher has hired the piracy protection firm Digimarc to police the internet for articles that are posted in the wild. As a result, universities all across the globe were targeted with takedown notices, which were also sent to Google in some cases.
The list of rogue researchers is long, and includes professors from MIT, Stanford, Northwestern University, University of Washington, UC Berkeley, University of Michigan, University of WisconsinMadison and many international universities.
In the takedown notices Digimarc writes that the publisher has authorized their company to send DMCA Takedown notices to infringers that illegally post or sell ASCE content. In other words, ASCE is branding their own authors as pirates because theyre sharing the own work. Below is an example of a takedown notice for a paper written by Ronaldo Borja, Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford.
<snip>
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Many new "professional" journals are popping up. You pay to have your "research" published. Peer review is not required,
I envision where they also could sue if you reprint your own article.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)If a musician writes a song and registers the song with ASCAP, they then can't play the song in a venue that doesn't have an ASCAP license. Yes, they can't play the song they wrote. However, ASCAP sues the venue rather than the musician, figuring the venue has deeper pockets and more at risk than the musician.
I constantly advise the local musicians to register their songs with the US Copyright office. Not only is it far cheaper, but the musician can play their songs whereever they like, even unlicensed venues. US Copyright office won't collect and distribute royalties, but unless the song is a commercial radio hit or on TV the chances of collecting royalties from ASCAP is virtually nil. The whole music licensing thing is nothing but an extortion racket. A small bar, holding less than 100 people, will have to pay over $6000/ yr to the 3 major licensing groups - ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC , if they have live music 3 or 4 nights a week.