The more inept you are the smarter you think you are (BBC)
Tom Stafford
You're pretty smart right? Clever, and funny too. Of course you are, just like me. But wouldn't it be terrible if we were mistaken? Psychologists have shown that we are more likely to be blind to our own failings than perhaps we realise. This could explain why some incompetent people are so annoying, and also inject a healthy dose of humility into our own sense of self-regard.
In 1999, Justin Kruger and David Dunning, from Cornell University, New York, tested whether people who lack the skills or abilities for something are also more likely to lack awareness of their lack of ability. At the start of their research paper they cite a Pittsburgh bank robber called McArthur Wheeler as an example, who was arrested in 1995 shortly after robbing two banks in broad daylight without wearing a mask or any other kind of disguise. When police showed him the security camera footage, he protested "But I wore the juice". The hapless criminal believed that if you rubbed your face with lemon juice you would be invisible to security cameras.
Kruger and Dunning were interested in testing another kind of laughing matter. They asked professional comedians to rate 30 jokes for funniness. Then, 65 undergraduates were asked to rate the jokes too, and then ranked according to how well their judgements matched those of the professionals. They were also asked how well they thought they had done compared to the average person.
As you might expect, most people thought their ability to tell what was funny was above average. The results were, however, most interesting when split according to how well participants performed. Those slightly above average in their ability to rate jokes were highly accurate in their self-assessment, while those who actually did the best tended to think they were only slightly above average. Participants who were least able to judge what was funny (at least according to the professional comics) were also least able to accurately assess their own ability.
This finding was not a quirk of trying to measure subjective sense of humour. The researchers repeated the experiment, only this time with tests of logical reasoning and grammar. These disciplines have defined answers, and in each case they found the same pattern: those people who performed the worst were also the worst in estimating their own aptitude. In all three studies, those whose performance put them in the lowest quarter massively overestimated their own abilities by rating themselves as above average.
***
more: http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20131125-why-the-stupid-say-theyre-smart
This has probably been posted here before, but it still explains a lot about "conservatives" (actually radical reactionaries).
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)indie9197
(509 posts)which I have seen over and over again
GeoWilliam750
(2,522 posts)How my movie-star good looks were not of greater benefit to me..............
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)Psychologists have known about this for years. It gangs up with a couple of other psychological tendencies (such as SIT, the actor-observer effect and the tendency to resist correcting even if presented with irrefutable proof of our wrongness) to explain reactionaries.
Personally, I know I'm bright because MENSA have tested me but my SO has also made me well aware of my many flaws.