Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,220 posts)
Sat Jan 18, 2014, 04:10 AM Jan 2014

Obamacare's a "Bailout" Now? Conservative Critics Are Getting Desperate

Conservatives used to say Obamacare is socialized medicine. Now they say it is a “government bailout” of insurers.

The new claim is just as misleading and cynical as the old one.

The latest conservative plaything is a pair of previously obscure Obamacare features: “reinsurance” and “risk corridors.” Their mechanisms are a bit complicated to explain. (Read here if you want the details.) What matters is their shared purpose, which is to reimburse insurance companies that end up taking heavy losses—say, because the new marketplaces don’t attract enough young, healthy subscribers. Remember, insurers depend on premiums from people in good health to subsidize the costs of the sick. Without the right mix, the premiums insurers collect won’t be sufficient to cover the cost of clams. They’ll lose money, raise premiums in the future, drop out of the market altogether, or some combination of the three. In short, bad stuff will happen.

To Obamacare supporters, reinsurance and risk corridors are tools for stabilizing the insurance market and easing the transition from the old system to the new. (That’s why I’ve been calling them “shock absorbers.”) But the provisions started attracting scrutiny from the right in the fall, when policy watchers like David Freddoso of Conservative Intelligence Briefing first wrote about it. Now reinsurance and risk corridors are getting more sustained attention from the Weekly Standard, Fox News, and the conservative movement writ large. Republican Senator Marco Rubio has sponsored a bill to repeal the risk corridors. “Why should taxpayers have to bail out health insurance companies in the increasingly likely event that ObamaCare leaves them with financial losses?” Rubio wrote this week, in an op-ed for the Fox website. “This is government favoritism and corporate cronyism at its worst, and it’s taxpayers that will pay the price unless we stop it.” Insurers are sufficiently spooked that, as Buzzfeed’s Kate Nocera has reported, they are undertaking a lobbying campaign to keep the provisions in place.

More at http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116230/why-obamacare-not-bailout-insurers .

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obamacare's a "Bailout" Now? Conservative Critics Are Getting Desperate (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jan 2014 OP
WE DECEIVE YOU BELIEVE blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #1
section 1342 of the ACA... quadrature Jan 2014 #2
The normal way all insurance works jmowreader Jan 2014 #5
sec.1341 is reinsurance. 1342 is the bailout...nt quadrature Jan 2014 #7
A bailout for insurance companies, perhaps. Why do we need them anyway? nt bemildred Jan 2014 #3
it is a bailout of insurance companies Doctor_J Jan 2014 #4
When forced to fling enough shit, some pieces legitimately stick. This is true. TheKentuckian Jan 2014 #6

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
5. The normal way all insurance works
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 03:05 AM
Jan 2014

I came to the conclusion a long time ago that Republicans have no idea in hell how the business world works. This reinforces that conclusion.

Reinsurance is nothing outrageous or groundbreaking; rather, it's how insurance companies keep from going broke. That the Republicans are attacking it says that Republicans just want something to bitch about.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
4. it is a bailout of insurance companies
Sat Jan 18, 2014, 08:56 PM
Jan 2014

I'd be surprised if the president didn't realize that at some point this huge giveaway to the already filthy rich insurance companies would backfire. And of course it leaves millions without while raising the rates of many.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
6. When forced to fling enough shit, some pieces legitimately stick. This is true.
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 08:25 PM
Jan 2014

The whole concept is about propping up and ensuring the viability of the cartel, I'd think the assertion would be completely uncontroversial.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Obamacare's a "Bailo...