On Keystone XL, will Obama stand up to big oil?
<snip>
The president has a handy excuse, of course: a truly terrible Congress. And too often with the noble exception of those who have been fighting for gay rights and immigration reform he's had little challenge from progressives. But in the case of Keystone, neither of those caveats apply: he gets to make the decision all by himself with no need to ask John Boehner for a thing, and people across the country have made a sustained din about it. Americans have sent record numbers of emails to senators and a record number of comments to the State Department officials who oversee a "review" of the pipeline's environmental feasibility; more have gone to jail over this issue than any in decades. Yet month after month, there's no presidential decision.
There are days, in fact, when it's hard to muster much fire for the fight (though whenever I find my enthusiasm flagging, I think of the indigenous communities that have to live amid the Mordor that is now northern Alberta). The president, after all, has already allowed the construction of the southern half of the Keystone pipeline, letting Transcanada take land across Texas and Oklahoma for its project, and setting up the beleaguered communities of Port Arthur, Texas, for yet more fumes from refineries.
Stopping the northern half of that pipeline from being built certainly won't halt global warming by itself. It will, however, slow the expansion of the extraction of tar sands, though the Koch brothers et al are busy trying to find other pipeline routes and rail lines that would get the dirtiest of dirty energy out of Canada and into the US via destinations from Michigan to Maine. These pipelines and rail corridors will need to be fought as well indeed the fights are underway, though sometimes obscured by the focus on Keystone. And there are equally crucial battles over coal and gas from the Appalachians to the Pacific coast. You can argue that the president's people have successfully diverted attention from their other environmental sins by keeping this argument alive long past the moment at which it should have been settled and a decision should have been made.
At this point, in fact, only the thought of those 900,000 extra barrels a day of especially nasty oil coming out of the ground and, via that pipeline, into refineries still makes the fight worthwhile. Oh, and the possibility that, in deciding to block Keystone, the president would finally signal a shift in policy that matters, finally acknowledge that we have to keep most of the carbon that's still in the ground in that ground if we want our children and grandchildren to live on a planet worth inhabiting.
<snip>
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/28/obama-keystone-xl-pipeline-climate-change
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)the obtuse ignore what the EPA has been doing. It has been in the headlines.
villager
(26,001 posts)In any case, Keystone XL will matter quite a bit. Let's see what Obama actually does.