Labor to Dems: We'll End Your Career If You Cut Social Security
AFL-CIO head Richard Trumka is ready to take names and kick ass if Democrats join the rush to cut Social Security as part of a "Grand Bargain." From the Huffington Post: AFL-CIO To Democrats: We'll Work To End Your Career, If You Cut Social Security or Medicare:
...............//snip
The rest of us also need to let our congresscritters know we won't stand for any, repeat any cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,681 posts)NO true Democrat would ever work to cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.
EVER
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)is doing so only to avoid taking the necessary step of raising the caps on SS and taxing the rich.
It's really an Us or Them issue, and there is no Grand Deal to be made that this might be part of.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)dchill
(38,517 posts)Southside
(338 posts)Go Labor, with you all the way!
Thank you for the post. I appreciate the diversity on DU so much. The whole spectrum on the left is represented.
dchill
(38,517 posts)Cruel Punishment Indeed. "Don't try it!"
tridim
(45,358 posts)Democrats have not and will not cut SS.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Tell, me, who hacked Obama's budget and put the proposed cuts in it for all to see posted? Why also has the whitehouse then not removed the material put there by your fictitious hackers?
One thing that really bothers me, why do you delight in calling Obama a liar every time his entitlement reform suggestions come up in conversation? Calling the president a liar is a Teabagger thing you know, not a loyalist thing.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)but I'm afraid the reference might fly over a TP's head, and when somebody explains it, they'd turn and gore me. So I won't. Doc's still searching for fragments of the last horn I took to the belly.
That said, it's not unknown for master strategists to dangle red meat before an opponent just to lure them into a well-laid trap. I'm sure Trumpka knows this. President Obama certainly does. We might conceivably be watching another well coordinated game of broken wings. I applaud Trumka's statement which some Dems do indeed need to hear, not to mention the entire GOP. At this point I maintain every confidence in President Obama as well, and right here and now I'll bet your house that he will deliver as always.
I hope the GOPers squalling that President Obama is out to destroy their party are right for once, because I'd love to see it pounded down to an oil spot on the highway of ancient history. But what if their older mainliners mean it when they say now that there'll be no more government shutdowns? If so, it will only be due to their missing toes and fingers. IF they're not suicidal enough to eat rat poison twice, what's left for bait? Chained CPI, maybe?
doc03
(35,363 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time
-Harry S. Truman
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)I freed a thousand slaves I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves.
Harriet Tubman (American escaped slave, Civil War Soldier and Abolitionist, 1820-1913)
cui bono
(19,926 posts)-Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)last1standing
(11,709 posts)Cutting these programs obviously is not in the interest of our senior citizens who spent their working lives paying into the programs, but also to the economy and the people at large. It will take money out of the economy where it is desperately needed while pushing even more responsibility onto younger families already burdened with the rising cost of raising children, college, healthcare, etc...
There is not one single rational excuse for cutting either of these programs and any so-called Democrat who proposes doing so should be primaried.
I stand, in solidarity, with labor.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)The government wastes billions on a bloated military but wants to cut "entitlements". It is bullshit.
There are too many better answers than cuts to people that are just scraping by.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Old Codger
(4,205 posts)What he said in spades........
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)We should be enhancing and increasing both SS and Medicare and not cutting those programs.
Corporations that are making billions in profits (e.g. Exxon, etc.) and billionaires (e.g. Koch, etc.) can afford to pay more in taxes to ensure that all of us have a meaningful and secure retirement. They have benefitted from our market economy, all of the perks they consume for which they pay less than their share (e.g. roads, bridges, education), etc.
It is time for them to pay the piper, so to speak.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Warner and Kaine will sell us down the river on Social Security as they are really Republicans at heart and in the pockets of corporations. Our only hope is pressure on these guys and Bernie Sanders. There are better ways to address any issues in the future regarding SS and Medicare than throwing older Americans under the bus. Increase employment--good, middle class jobs--and eliminate the cap. Once the cap is eliminated, do a means testing.
Euphoria
(448 posts)Rebellious Republican
(5,029 posts)RainDog
(28,784 posts)for defense contractors.
Why is it that programs that benefit the most vulnerable in our society are the targets? Oh yeah, it's easy to pick on them.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/06/10/senate-report-war-on-drugs-failed/
"It's becoming increasingly clear that our efforts to rein in the narcotics trade in Latin America, especially as it relates to the government's use of contractors, have largely failed," Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight, said in a media advisory. "Without adequate oversight and management we are wasting tax dollars and throwing money at a problem without even knowing what we're getting in return."
The McCaskill report indicates that U.S. taxpayers have shelled out over $3 billion for work and equipment related to the drug war in Latin America from 2005-2009, and most of that money went to private contractors.
McCaskill launched the inquiry after looking into counternarcotics efforts underway in Afghanistan. However, neither the Department of Defense nor the State Dept. were able to provide adequate documentation on their contracts and in many cases could not even identify firms that were given millions in tax dollars.
Five major defense contractors received the bulk of drug war contract spending: Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, DynCorp, ARINC and ITT. Out of all the firms, DynCorp benefitted most, winning $1.1 billion.
A billion here and a billion there, and the next thing you know...
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)contractor's homes or businesses, do we?
tavalon
(27,985 posts)And I and every other union member will stand in solidarity. No messing with the safety net!!!!!