KRUGMAN: Untruths, Wholly Untrue, And Nothing But Untruths
...............
I was deeply radicalized by the 2000 election. At first I couldnt believe that then-candidate George W. Bush was saying so many clearly, provably false things; then I couldnt believe that nobody in the news media was willing to point out the lies. (At the time, the Times actually told me that I couldnt use the l-word either). That was when I formulated my views differ on shape of planet motto.
Now, however, Mitt Romney seems determined to rehabilitate Bushs reputation, by running a campaign so dishonest that it makes Bush look like a model of truth-telling.
the rest:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/13/untruths-wholly-untrue-and-nothing-but-untruths/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&seid=auto
babylonsister
(171,091 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Krugman not to point out lies Bush told in 2000.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)and with Iran, is shooting for more.
NYT must be read very critically...at least since Clinton (which is when I started cursing it).
City Lights
(25,171 posts)And just yesterday they were asking whether journalists should challenge false statements made by policymakers they're reporting on. Unreal.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)is in the realm of the unreal. Totally jaw dropping.
Uncle Joe
(58,417 posts)Thanks for the thread, kpete.
Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)It's the strategy laid out by Joseph Goebells, pure and simple:
If you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth.
Romney and the other Rethugs have learned well the lessons of the infamous Nazi propagandist.
Stuart G
(38,445 posts)fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)remember how that same corporate media keeps putting you down for your "liberal ideals". Think about why they would.
tclambert
(11,087 posts)Why is he ashamed of his first name? Why is he trying to hide it? Is that why he refuses to reveal his tax returns?