Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
"Lockdown" - interesting thoughts on the war for Internet eyeballs and its effect on openness
From Marco Arment ("creator of Instapaper, technology writer, and coffee enthusiast" comes this interesting rumination about how Google+, Facebook, and Twitter are each trying to replicate the old AOL "walled garden" version of the Internet -- becoming all things to their users, to the exclusion of all competitors (and independent non-business "competitors" for those eyeballs as well).
Lockdown - July 3, 2013
from marco.org
Officially, Google killed Reader because over the years usage has declined. I believe that statement, especially if API clients werent considered usage, but I dont believe thats the entire reason.
The most common assumption Ive seen others cite is that Google couldnt figure out how to monetize Reader, or other variants about direct profitability. I dont believe this, either. Google Readers operational costs likely paled in comparison to many of their other projects that dont bring in major revenue, and Ive heard from multiple sources that it effectively had a staff of zero for years. It was just running, quietly serving a vital role for a lot of people.
This is how RSS and Atom have always worked: you put in some effort up front to get the system built, and in most instances, you never need to touch it. It just hums along, immune to redesigns, changing APIs, web-development trends, and slash-and-burn executives on sunsetting sprees.
RSS was the original web-service API. The original mashup enabler. And its still healthy and going strong.
Mostly.
RSS grew up in a boom time for consumer web services and truly open APIs, but it especially spread like wildfire in the blogging world. Personal blogs and RSS represented true vendor independence: you could host your site anywhere, with any software. You could change those whenever anything started to suck, because there were many similar choices and your readers could always find your site at the domain name you owned....
Google Reader is just the latest casualty of the war that Facebook started, seemingly accidentally: the battle to own everything. While Google did technically own Reader and could make some use of the huge amount of news and attention data flowing through it, it conflicted with their far more important Google+ strategy: they need everyone reading and sharing everything through Google+ so they can compete with Facebook for ad-targeting data, ad dollars, growth, and relevance.
RSS represents the antithesis of this new world: its completely open, decentralized, and owned by nobody, just like the web itself. It allows anyone, large or small, to build something new and disrupt anyone else theyd like because nobody has to fly six salespeople out first to work out a partnership with anyone elses salespeople.
That world formed the webs foundations without that world to build on, Google, Facebook, and Twitter couldnt exist. But theyve now grown so large that everything from that web-native world is now a threat to them, and they want to shut it down. Sunset it. Clean it up. Retire it. Get it out of the way so they can get even bigger and build even bigger proprietary barriers to anyone trying to claim their territory.
Well, fuck them, and fuck that.
more: http://www.marco.org/2013/07/03/lockdown
from marco.org
Officially, Google killed Reader because over the years usage has declined. I believe that statement, especially if API clients werent considered usage, but I dont believe thats the entire reason.
The most common assumption Ive seen others cite is that Google couldnt figure out how to monetize Reader, or other variants about direct profitability. I dont believe this, either. Google Readers operational costs likely paled in comparison to many of their other projects that dont bring in major revenue, and Ive heard from multiple sources that it effectively had a staff of zero for years. It was just running, quietly serving a vital role for a lot of people.
This is how RSS and Atom have always worked: you put in some effort up front to get the system built, and in most instances, you never need to touch it. It just hums along, immune to redesigns, changing APIs, web-development trends, and slash-and-burn executives on sunsetting sprees.
RSS was the original web-service API. The original mashup enabler. And its still healthy and going strong.
Mostly.
RSS grew up in a boom time for consumer web services and truly open APIs, but it especially spread like wildfire in the blogging world. Personal blogs and RSS represented true vendor independence: you could host your site anywhere, with any software. You could change those whenever anything started to suck, because there were many similar choices and your readers could always find your site at the domain name you owned....
Google Reader is just the latest casualty of the war that Facebook started, seemingly accidentally: the battle to own everything. While Google did technically own Reader and could make some use of the huge amount of news and attention data flowing through it, it conflicted with their far more important Google+ strategy: they need everyone reading and sharing everything through Google+ so they can compete with Facebook for ad-targeting data, ad dollars, growth, and relevance.
RSS represents the antithesis of this new world: its completely open, decentralized, and owned by nobody, just like the web itself. It allows anyone, large or small, to build something new and disrupt anyone else theyd like because nobody has to fly six salespeople out first to work out a partnership with anyone elses salespeople.
That world formed the webs foundations without that world to build on, Google, Facebook, and Twitter couldnt exist. But theyve now grown so large that everything from that web-native world is now a threat to them, and they want to shut it down. Sunset it. Clean it up. Retire it. Get it out of the way so they can get even bigger and build even bigger proprietary barriers to anyone trying to claim their territory.
Well, fuck them, and fuck that.
more: http://www.marco.org/2013/07/03/lockdown
By the way, I came across this article via an RSS newsreader, NetNewsWire. It's doubtful I would have found it otherwise.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 634 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post