Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,026 posts)
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 05:57 PM Jul 2013

Glenn Greenwald's Anti-Obama Vendetta Continues

here was a time when I really wished I could understand what drives Glenn Greenwald's hatred of President Obama. But then, I realized. I really don't care. I just wish his editors would be a little more discerning with his use of links and, um, "facts." I used to be able to count on the UK Guardian as an unwavering, very dependable news source, but it's becoming more difficult to do so, when they hire people like Greenwald to write for them.

First of all, they portray Greenwald as a progressive or liberal, and I don't see him that way at all. But that isn't what really bothers me about Greenwald. The most bothersome thing is the way he uses suppositions and facts interchangeably, as if they're equal.

Take his latest column, regarding Obama's nomination of James Comey as director of the FBI. Greenwald, as usual, uses the column as a vehicle for tooting his own horn, and to make an unsubstantiated attack against President Obama. First, he tries to establish himself as an expert on the covert activities of the Bush Administration, because he’s written about it many times. Now, I would never belittle that. I actually find much of the information on the NSA spying program to be very credible. Yet, he seems to have chosen to ignore his own notes in some spots, only to remember them later, when he's pretty sure readers have stopped reading. In this article, he makes statements about Comey that are simply not supported by available evidence, and then contradicts himself. In fact, after he starts like a house afire, and essentially blames Cowey for the downfall of civil rights, by the end of the article, he pretty much admits that Obama could have chosen much worse.

The question I keep asking myself is, where are his editors? He's not writing for his own personal blog; he's representing a truly good news organization. Why does he get to tell outright lies and then contradict himself later within the same column.

Read more: http://pleasecutthecrap.typepad.com/main/2013/05/glenn-greenwalds-obama-vendetta-pops-up-again.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Glenn Greenwald's Anti-Obama Vendetta Continues (Original Post) Galraedia Jul 2013 OP
... Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #1
GOLDSTEIN!!! frylock Jul 2013 #2
GOLDSTEIN???? -> The constraint of "rolling" connects these two sets of coordinates. ???? n/t xocet Jul 2013 #4
We've now entered July! CobaltBlue Jul 2013 #3
All that verbiage to slog through to find they can not state even one errror the Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #5

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
1. ...
Mon Jul 1, 2013, 06:00 PM
Jul 2013

:eyeroll: How many more ineffectual posts are you all going to make to try and make this about the messenger?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. All that verbiage to slog through to find they can not state even one errror the
Tue Jul 2, 2013, 09:38 AM
Jul 2013

editors at the Guardian should have spotted like this ego blogger claims to have spotted, but can not manage to point out name or provide correction for.
The tactics used in this OP discredit the author and poster entirely. Barf on toast, it is a pack of insinuations and unproven blather.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Glenn Greenwald's Anti-Ob...