Glenn Greenwald's Anti-Obama Vendetta Continues
here was a time when I really wished I could understand what drives Glenn Greenwald's hatred of President Obama. But then, I realized. I really don't care. I just wish his editors would be a little more discerning with his use of links and, um, "facts." I used to be able to count on the UK Guardian as an unwavering, very dependable news source, but it's becoming more difficult to do so, when they hire people like Greenwald to write for them.
First of all, they portray Greenwald as a progressive or liberal, and I don't see him that way at all. But that isn't what really bothers me about Greenwald. The most bothersome thing is the way he uses suppositions and facts interchangeably, as if they're equal.
Take his latest column, regarding Obama's nomination of James Comey as director of the FBI. Greenwald, as usual, uses the column as a vehicle for tooting his own horn, and to make an unsubstantiated attack against President Obama. First, he tries to establish himself as an expert on the covert activities of the Bush Administration, because hes written about it many times. Now, I would never belittle that. I actually find much of the information on the NSA spying program to be very credible. Yet, he seems to have chosen to ignore his own notes in some spots, only to remember them later, when he's pretty sure readers have stopped reading. In this article, he makes statements about Comey that are simply not supported by available evidence, and then contradicts himself. In fact, after he starts like a house afire, and essentially blames Cowey for the downfall of civil rights, by the end of the article, he pretty much admits that Obama could have chosen much worse.
The question I keep asking myself is, where are his editors? He's not writing for his own personal blog; he's representing a truly good news organization. Why does he get to tell outright lies and then contradict himself later within the same column.
Read more: http://pleasecutthecrap.typepad.com/main/2013/05/glenn-greenwalds-obama-vendetta-pops-up-again.html
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts):eyeroll: How many more ineffectual posts are you all going to make to try and make this about the messenger?
frylock
(34,825 posts)xocet
(3,871 posts)CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)That was from a month ago, OP!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)editors at the Guardian should have spotted like this ego blogger claims to have spotted, but can not manage to point out name or provide correction for.
The tactics used in this OP discredit the author and poster entirely. Barf on toast, it is a pack of insinuations and unproven blather.