Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Zimmerman’s Attorney: If Jury Rules Trayvon Was Aggressor, Is That A ‘Loss For Civil Rights’?
Zimmermans Attorney: If Jury Rules Trayvon Was Aggressor, Is That A Loss For Civil Rights?
by Evan McMurry | 1:24 pm, June 1st, 2013 video » 555 comments
Following a judges ruling on Tuesday to not admit elements of Trayvon Martins past, including drug use and prior incidents of fighting, as evidence in the murder trial of George Zimmerman, CNNs Victor Blackwell interviewed Zimmermans attorney Mark OMara on this decisions potential ramifications to the defenses argument, especially given the loaded racial connotations of the case.
Parks and Crump, Blackwell asked, referencing the Dickensian-named law firm representing Martins family, have said a lot about how this is a landmark in justice as it relates to African Americans, and racial injustice. How do you keep this trial limited to a few minutes on one night in February?
Well, let me ask you this. If they acquit George because the jury says Trayvon was the aggressor, if they make that decision, is that going to be a loss for civil rights? Is it? If the jury decides hes acquitted because Trayvon was the aggressor, is that a civil rights event? I would suggest not. If they convict George because they think he was the aggressor, is that a benefit to civil rights? Some might say maybe, because at least a young black male victim of a homicide was justified, or his loss was not in vain. So they might say, If you get the conviction then at least he wasnt a lost life. Maybe. But the real decision is going to be who was the aggressor and whether or not George acted reasonably. Those two decisions have nothing to do with rights. They just dont.
Now, had the case never gone to trial, maybe. Had they said, Were not going to prosecute this guy because he killed a black kid, then, okay, maybe thats a civil rights issue. But the jury decides what theyre going to decide, I just dont see the civil rights connotation to it. I know civil rights, not as well as many of my compatriots, but I know it pretty well. And I grew up in the Sixties and Seventies, so I get a feel for this stuff, and I dont see civil rights in this day today.
Was today a loss for you? Blackwell asked.
No! OMara said. I like the idea that were limiting the evidence to what it should be. It was five to six minutes that happened from the time of the non-emergency call to the time of the gunshot and afterwards with the emergency call. If we limit it to that, whatever that jury decides has to be the proper verdict, as long as they follow the evidence and the law, and then were done.
Watch the whole interview here: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/george-zimmermans-attorney-if-jury-rules-trayvon-was-the-aggressor-is-that-a-loss-for-civil-rights/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1621 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Zimmerman’s Attorney: If Jury Rules Trayvon Was Aggressor, Is That A ‘Loss For Civil Rights’? (Original Post)
marble falls
Jun 2013
OP
diabeticman
(3,121 posts)1. Sounds like they are setting up the appeal.
Laurian
(2,593 posts)2. This week before the trial begins is going to be an unending media circus
with Zimmerman's attorney spouting any bullshit he thinks might make its way to potential jurors. I hate the way this is being done.
grok
(550 posts)3. It will be fundraising BONUS!!!
For Crump, the Martins anybody that wants to be outraged about it.
with gz convicted, the issue dies and so will any real interest in overturning the SYG.
Sure, GZ will have his supporters and there would be some outrage and minor fundraising to overturn. but he is not white or ethnic enough to make it feel personal.
Aristus
(66,467 posts)4. For the last fucking time!: Zimmerman got out of the truck!
With a gun!
How the hell was Trayvon Martin the aggressor?!?!
bluedeathray
(511 posts)5. ^^ Exactly
How is this case not open and shut? Are the facts in dispute?