Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Supposedly "liberal" talking points aim to confuse public over DOJ/AP phone scandal
Sorry, Media Matters, no one actually wants your talking points
Yesterday, Media Matters, the liberal media watchdog group, sent out to a fairly massive email list a talking points memo defending the Obama Justice Departments obtaining of Associated Press phone logs. The talking points were distributed to 3,000 progressive talkers and influentials, according to Media Matters head David Brock. (But not me, for the record. I am not an influential.)
Like all talking points, these talking points were dumb and full of weird weaselly language and made worse by the fact that each claim was designed to be repeated by people on TV who presumably dont believe what they say or at least dont really care that much. For those interested in pushing back against partisan attacks while the rest of us grapple with the larger questions, here is language to guide you, the memo said. The rest of us will be back here, grappling, while you engage in your semi-scripted verbal combat, with some guy who has different talking points.
So the memo instructs the professional progressive influential to raise some key questions, like: Is this story about a government source blowing the whistle on government misbehavior, or about a source gratuitously exposing ongoing counter-terrorism operations? And: How should the Justice Department strike the balance between respecting our free press and investigating damaging leaks that jeopardize counter-terrorism operations? (These seem more like essay prompts than issues, actually?) And obviously raising these key issues, even in this just asking questions! manner, basically amounts, as Jason Linkins writes, to mounting a defense of the Justice Department that is neither necessary nor justifiable...
Thats why this memo was a failure before it was even drafted: I dont think most liberals particularly want to defend the Justice Department in this case. The whole thing grosses people out. There is some its not as bad as everyone is making it out to be talk but not much going-to-the-mat the administration is totally right and the AP is totally wrong and un-American going on, from media liberals in the papers, the major blogs and even cable news. The best Message Matters could do is accuse conservatives of hypocrisy on the issue, which is a fair charge but note quite a compelling defense. Liberals will occasionally (or frequently, depending on the liberal) defend things Obama does that they wouldve protested coming from Bush. But theyre much more likely to ignore inconvenient stuff than defend it, as Ive previously argued. (And make no mistake, vociferous, splenetic defense of literally everything Bush did was very much the operative mode of the conservative movement during those years, even if since hes left office they now all pretend to have been disgusted by his profligacy.)
...
...
more: http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/sorry_media_matters_no_one_actually_wants_your_talking_points/
Like all talking points, these talking points were dumb and full of weird weaselly language and made worse by the fact that each claim was designed to be repeated by people on TV who presumably dont believe what they say or at least dont really care that much. For those interested in pushing back against partisan attacks while the rest of us grapple with the larger questions, here is language to guide you, the memo said. The rest of us will be back here, grappling, while you engage in your semi-scripted verbal combat, with some guy who has different talking points.
So the memo instructs the professional progressive influential to raise some key questions, like: Is this story about a government source blowing the whistle on government misbehavior, or about a source gratuitously exposing ongoing counter-terrorism operations? And: How should the Justice Department strike the balance between respecting our free press and investigating damaging leaks that jeopardize counter-terrorism operations? (These seem more like essay prompts than issues, actually?) And obviously raising these key issues, even in this just asking questions! manner, basically amounts, as Jason Linkins writes, to mounting a defense of the Justice Department that is neither necessary nor justifiable...
Thats why this memo was a failure before it was even drafted: I dont think most liberals particularly want to defend the Justice Department in this case. The whole thing grosses people out. There is some its not as bad as everyone is making it out to be talk but not much going-to-the-mat the administration is totally right and the AP is totally wrong and un-American going on, from media liberals in the papers, the major blogs and even cable news. The best Message Matters could do is accuse conservatives of hypocrisy on the issue, which is a fair charge but note quite a compelling defense. Liberals will occasionally (or frequently, depending on the liberal) defend things Obama does that they wouldve protested coming from Bush. But theyre much more likely to ignore inconvenient stuff than defend it, as Ive previously argued. (And make no mistake, vociferous, splenetic defense of literally everything Bush did was very much the operative mode of the conservative movement during those years, even if since hes left office they now all pretend to have been disgusted by his profligacy.)
...
...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1233 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supposedly "liberal" talking points aim to confuse public over DOJ/AP phone scandal (Original Post)
limpyhobbler
May 2013
OP
GeorgeGist
(25,323 posts)1. Fail!