What a Conspiracy Theorist Believes
BY GARY MARCUS
On a four-point scale, from one (strongly disagree) to four (strongly agree), please rate the following statements: The Apollo moon landings never happened and were staged in a Hollywood film studio; Princess Dianas death was not an accident but rather an organized assassination by members of the British Royal Family who disliked her; The Coca-Cola Company intentionally changed to an inferior formula with the intent of driving up demand for their classic product, later reintroducing it for their financial gain; and Carbon dioxide emissions resulting from human activities cause climate change.
Questions like those formed the core of one of the most intriguing studies I have seen in a long time, a brand-new study, just published in Psychological Science, that investigated the dynamics of science doubters. The Australian psychologist Stephan Lewandowsky and two collaborators surveyed over a thousand visitors to online climate blogs (all relatively positive toward science), and asked them questions about free-market ideology and their views on climate science. The investigators also probed for their conspiracist ideation by asking questions like the ones above about faked Apollo moon landings and the assassination of Princess Diana. Some subjects were eliminated because they appear to have lied about their age (it is doubtful that anyone under five completed the survey, for instance), and as a precaution, to prevent ballot-box stuffing, the experimenters also eliminated answers where more than one response came a single I.P. address.
In principle, you could imagine that peoples answers to these questions might be logically independent. One could be a conspiracy theorist about Coca-Cola without having any particular views about climate change, or vice versa. And indeed, some subjects really did believe in climate change even as they doubted the intentions of the sugar-water company from Atlanta, and vice versa.
But, over all, the trends were clear. The more people believed in free-market ideology, the less they believed in climate science; the more they accepted science in general, the more they accepted the conclusions of climate science; and the more likely they were to be conspiracy theorists, the less likely they were to believe in climate science.
more
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/04/conspiracy-theory-climate-change-science-psychology.html
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)A conspiracy theory is never called a conspiracy theory if it turns out to be proven true.
The Iraq war was launched on a conspiracy, indeed it was a conspiracy about a conspiracy.