"The American Roots of Neoliberalism"
By Daniel Stedman Jones
"The word neoliberalism -- the ideology of free markets, deregulation and limited government -- is easily lost in translation from the European to the American context. In part this is a reflection of the different meanings of liberalism in Europe and the United States. But it also highlights a gap in historical understanding, which is only just beginning to be filled.
In Europe (and much of the wider world), neoliberalism is often seen as an American model of unrestrained market capitalism that has wrought havoc both on the developing world through the structural adjustment policies of the Washington Consensus and, most recently, by causing the financial crisis that brought the world economy to its knees in 2008. In the United States, by contrast, mention of the word often raises a quizzical glance, an assumption that it has something to do with Bill Clintons New Democrats who claimed to reform liberalism in the late 1980s and 1990s or prompts a conversation about the rights or wrongs of the worldview of Paul Wolfowitz, the archetypal neo-conservative. Free markets are anyway viewed in the United States by advocates as being as American as apple pie and little attention is paid to the trans-Atlantic influences that have led to a distinctively neoliberal conception of free enterprise taking hold among American policymakers.
These misconceptions are unhelpful because they obscure important elements of recent transatlantic history. It is of course true that American historians, since Alan Brinkleys famous 1994 essay, "The Problem of American Conservatism," have opened up in all sorts of fruitful directions the study of the rightward turn taken in the United States since the 1960s. But it remains a strange feature of the debate, perhaps another hangover of oft-noted American exceptionalism, that the history of the set of ideas that much of the rest of the world most associates with the American model of capitalism, neoliberalism, is only imperfectly understood in the United States itself. In my book, Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics, recently published by Princeton University Press, I trace the history of neoliberalism, which I argue obtained a distinctively American inflection in the postwar period.
Neoliberalism first emerged in the interwar period, primarily in Austria, Germany, France and the United Kingdom, among thinkers and economists, who saw a need to reform liberalism. Writers like Friedrich Hayek, Ludwig von Mises, Walter Eucken, Wilhelm Röpke, Raymond Aron and Jacques Rueff thought that the nightwatchman state of laissez faire, exemplified by nineteenth century Britain, had proved inadequate for the problems of the early twentieth century. They saw a threat to individual freedom in the defeat of liberal politics by the totalitarianism of fascism and communism. Neoliberals also saw the activist and interventionist liberalism of Franklin Roosevelts New Deal, along with that of the British Liberal governments of Herbert Henry Asquith and David Lloyd George, as a perversion of liberalism."
http://hnn.us/articles/american-roots-neoliberalism
freshwest
(53,661 posts)It's libertarianism as promoted by the Koch brothers and corporatists.
I never believed there was either a neo (new) form of liberalism or conservativism. Libertarianism fits those 3 criteria. Neither liberalism nor conserativism is anywhere close to what is now called the classical forms of those ideologies.
Liberalism only restrained trade to prevent the loss of wages and jobs. It was always for regulation of things, from banking to mining to stopping discrimination. It favored a limited government by not discriminating with regressive taxes or theocracy.
Conservatism has no respect for free trade in which its sponsors don't take the lion's share of and drive smaller enterprises out of business. They seek to regulate people's social lives that need to be protected or served by social services, but never their behavior in stealing by pollution, low wages, regressive taxes and seeking to discriminate and abuse, in order to knock them down the econmic ladder. They favor enough government to give them money through subsidies and contracts and starving the rest of the populatioh, which also advances their business model.
Just a few thoughts. YMMV.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Which originated in the late 18th century as the political corollary to capitalism. It spoke of the efficiencies of free markets (Adam Smith) over mercantilism. It also championed free-wage labor over slavery and other forms of forced labor.
Liberalism referred to the opening up of ports and markets to trade, not regulation. That's still how much of the rest of the world uses the term.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)I know the article was about the way they saw it in Europe, but I gotta go to sleep if I can (not likely) and get up in 6 hours if I can (ugh). And hey, I just kicked your thread!
bemildred
(90,061 posts)xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Democratic Socialism is the economics of the 21st century.