Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:43 PM Feb 2013

Natural gas isn’t the only reason U.S. carbon emissions are falling - Plumer, WaPo

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/02/15/natural-gas-isnt-the-only-reason-u-s-carbon-emissions-are-plummeting/

It’s become something of a cliché in energy-policy discussions: The United States is making headway on global warming and slashing its carbon-dioxide emissions all because of a glut of cheap natural gas that’s elbowing out dirtier coal power.

[div class="excerpt" style="width:200px;float:left;"]
These guys also want credit. (AES)But perhaps that natural-gas story is overly simplistic. A notable new analysis by Trevor Houser and Shashank Mohan of the Rhodium Group suggests that America’s budding renewable-energy sector — particularly wind power and biomass — deserves a big chunk of the credit for driving down U.S. emissions. On the flip side, the report also suggests that coal could soon make a comeback.

Houser and Mohan take a novel approach to analyzing the recent drop in carbon pollution. They start by noting that at the end of 2012, U.S. carbon emissions were about 13 percent below 2005 levels. They then tried to tease out the causes of this drop by constructing a counter-factual — what would have happened if energy trends from the 1990s and early 2000s had continued apace?

That led them to this graph, which separates out the causes of the recent decline in emissions. (On the far left is what emissions were projected to be based on 1990-2005 trends. On the far right is what emissions actually were.)



The recession and financial crisis, obviously, made a big difference. A weaker economy has meant less demand for energy — that was responsible for more than half the drop compared with business as usual.

(more)
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Natural gas isn’t the only reason U.S. carbon emissions are falling - Plumer, WaPo (Original Post) Bill USA Feb 2013 OP
natural gas is 85% methane, 105 times worse than CO2.. leaks from wells rabid_byter Feb 2013 #1
 

rabid_byter

(40 posts)
1. natural gas is 85% methane, 105 times worse than CO2.. leaks from wells
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:11 PM
Feb 2013

Methane (CH4) (about 85% of natural gas) is 105 times worse than CO2 as a greenhouse gas (GHG) on a 20 year time frame. it leaks from active well heads at about 8% and so old capped wells., it also vents from old existing water wells, and other sources. we are facing the worst environmental disaster yet from fracking.

there has never been a real environmental study don on Fracking... I wonder why.?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Natural gas isn’t the onl...