Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
“Free-Market” Outcomes Are Not Fair—and Not Free
from Dollars & Sense:
Free-Market Outcomes Are Not Fairand Not Free
BY MARTY WOLFSON | November/December 2012
Since 1980, the U.S. government has reduced its intervention in the U.S. economy, which has become much more of a free market. Conservatives applaud this development because they think that free-market outcomes reward talent and hard work; progressives object to the income inequality of free-market outcomes and want to use government tax and transfer policy to reduce inequality.
Most people, whether conservative or progressive, would probably agree with this statement. This framing of the issue, however, plays into a right-wing story in which conservatives are the defenders of (free) market outcomes, including the success of the rich who have made it on their own; meanwhile, the dependent poor look to the government for handouts. This has been a basic element of the right-wing playbook for a long time. Then-presidential candidate Mitt Romney was drawing on this narrative when he complained about the 47% of the U.S. population who are dependent upon government ... who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them.
This view has two main themes: 1) Because the U.S. free-market economy rewards talent and hard work, the middle class should emulate the wealthy for their success, not vilify them; and 2) those who have been failures in the market want the government to take care of them by redistributing income from those who have been successful. We can see these themes play out on all sorts of political issues. They form, for example, the basis for the attacks on the Affordable Health Care Act (or Obamacare). Middle-class Americans, in the conservative view, are being taxedforced to payto provide health insurance for those unsuccessful elements of the population who have not earned it themselves.
The conservative argument assumes that the outcomes we observe are the result of a free-market economy. However, the right-wing objective has not been to create a free market; it has been to rig government policy and the market so as to redistribute income towards large corporations and the wealthy. ..................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2012/1112wolfson.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1119 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Free-Market” Outcomes Are Not Fair—and Not Free (Original Post)
marmar
Jan 2013
OP
Absolutely correct! This is a major falsehood pushed in much of our media
Vinnie From Indy
Jan 2013
#1
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)1. Absolutely correct! This is a major falsehood pushed in much of our media
at the behest of the 1%'ers. It is simply undeniable that in America in the last decade that the 1%'ers have rigged the game. They have been able to "socialize" their losses and "privatize" their gains.
There are other Mt. Everest sized flaws in the idea that the US has a free market, capitalist based economy. One need only look at the cost we pay for high speed Internet, cable TV, pharmaceuticals and a host of other products to see them.
kairos12
(12,869 posts)2. Even the great demigod of the free marketeers Adam Smith...
recognized that without any truly fair regulation the dead hand of the market would choke itself on greed.