Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bob Fitrakis files lawsuit in Ohio re untested software inserted into voting machines
Looks like the GOP is planning another counterfeit election. They need Ohio. so if you can't win it in a real election, just scramble the votes a bit and voila! Ohio goes for Rmoney!!
Democracy, it's been good to know ya.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014291694
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1577 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bob Fitrakis files lawsuit in Ohio re untested software inserted into voting machines (Original Post)
Bill USA
Nov 2012
OP
Call the Ohio Secretary of State's office at 1-877-767-6446 - Do it RIGHT NOW!!!!
liberal N proud
Nov 2012
#3
here's a link to Freepress story. Emails to FreePress might be a good idea too.
Bill USA
Nov 2012
#4
thereismore
(13,326 posts)1. Why does a state like Ohio use no paper trail? It is driving me bonkers. nt
PuppyBismark
(595 posts)2. Every Ohio County gets to pick their voting machines
So, yes many, like Franklin County, Columbus, have paper trails, but not all of them. We don't want to step on the feet of the local boards of election and mandate anything like common equipment or processes.
liberal N proud
(60,344 posts)3. Call the Ohio Secretary of State's office at 1-877-767-6446 - Do it RIGHT NOW!!!!
Please do it right now. Call the Ohio Secretary of State's office at 1-877-767-6446
http://app.e2ma.net/app/view:CampaignPublic/id:29568.12940025935/rid:e5a510d4021c9fbc6a347ef5bb5b8d75
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)4. here's a link to Freepress story. Emails to FreePress might be a good idea too.
http://freepress.org/departments/display/19/2012/4779
[font size="3"]Ohio election law does not allow software or hardware to be used in election until it has been tested or certified by the Ohio Board of Voting Machine Examiners unless it is experimental. The confidential internal memos indicate that this software was never tested because of claims that it is not involved with the tabulation or communication of votes. Reporting election results from county tabulation systems to the secretary of state's office, which is the purpose of this software as explained by McClellan, is in fact communication of votes.[/font]
The potential federal illegality of this software has been hidden from public scrutiny by the Secretary of State's Election Counsel Brandi Seske. In a September 29 memo, Seske wrote, "Please see the attached letter from Matt Masterson regarding de minimis changes - one submitted by ES&S and one by Dominion Voting Systems. He has reviewed and approved the changes." "De minimis" is a legal term for minute. Federal election regulations have a very specific definition of de minimis. This definition was clarified to all state level agencies in a federal Elections Assistance Commission memo dated February 8, 2012 entitled "Software and Firmware modifications are not de minimis changes."
Ohio election law provides for experimental equipment only in a limited number of precincts per county. Installing uncertified and untested software on central tabulation equipment essential affects every single precinct in a given county. Nowhere in the memos circulated by Seske, nor in the contract, is the software called "experimental."
The Secretary of State's office has given one questionable justification to its own Board of Voting Machine Examiners and another to the public.
(more)
[font size="3"]Ohio election law does not allow software or hardware to be used in election until it has been tested or certified by the Ohio Board of Voting Machine Examiners unless it is experimental. The confidential internal memos indicate that this software was never tested because of claims that it is not involved with the tabulation or communication of votes. Reporting election results from county tabulation systems to the secretary of state's office, which is the purpose of this software as explained by McClellan, is in fact communication of votes.[/font]
The potential federal illegality of this software has been hidden from public scrutiny by the Secretary of State's Election Counsel Brandi Seske. In a September 29 memo, Seske wrote, "Please see the attached letter from Matt Masterson regarding de minimis changes - one submitted by ES&S and one by Dominion Voting Systems. He has reviewed and approved the changes." "De minimis" is a legal term for minute. Federal election regulations have a very specific definition of de minimis. This definition was clarified to all state level agencies in a federal Elections Assistance Commission memo dated February 8, 2012 entitled "Software and Firmware modifications are not de minimis changes."
Ohio election law provides for experimental equipment only in a limited number of precincts per county. Installing uncertified and untested software on central tabulation equipment essential affects every single precinct in a given county. Nowhere in the memos circulated by Seske, nor in the contract, is the software called "experimental."
The Secretary of State's office has given one questionable justification to its own Board of Voting Machine Examiners and another to the public.
(more)