Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsr

(7,712 posts)
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 12:01 AM Nov 2012

Sandy Versus Katrina

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/05/opinion/krugman-sandy-versus-katrina.html

Sandy Versus Katrina
By PAUL KRUGMAN

As Sandy barreled toward New Jersey, there were hopeful mutters on the right to the effect that it might become President Obama’s Katrina, with voters blaming him for the damage, and that this might matter on Tuesday. Sorry, guys: polls show overwhelming approval for Mr. Obama’s handling of the storm, and a significant rise in his overall favorability ratings.

And he deserves the bump. For the response to Sandy, like the success of the auto bailout, is a demonstration that Mr. Obama’s philosophy of government — which holds that the government can and should provide crucial aid in times of crisis — works. And conversely, the contrast between Sandy and Katrina demonstrates that leaders who hold government in contempt cannot provide that aid when it is needed.

So, about that response: Much of the greater New York area (including my house) is still without power; gasoline is scarce; and some outlying areas are feeling neglected. Right-wing news media are portraying these continuing difficulties as a disaster comparable to, nay greater than, the aftermath of Katrina. But there’s really no comparison.

I could do a point-by-point — and it’s definitely worth it, if you’re curious, to revisit the 2005 Katrina timeline to get a sense of just how bad the response really was. But for me the difference is summed up in two images. One is the nightmare at the New Orleans convention center, where thousands were stranded for days amid inconceivable squalor, an outrage that all of America watched live on TV, but to which top officials seemed oblivious. The other is the scene in flooded Hoboken, with the National Guard moving in the day after the storm struck to deliver food and water and rescue stranded residents. ...

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sandy Versus Katrina (Original Post) jsr Nov 2012 OP
Not to mention Sandy was at least 4 times the size, HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #1
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
1. Not to mention Sandy was at least 4 times the size,
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 12:13 AM
Nov 2012

affected a far larger area, affecting at least 10 times the population. Bush waited until 4 days after the storm to declare a disaster. Obama declared a disaster 2 days before the storm, had personel and supplies pre-positioned, and help started moving in the day after the storm. BIG difference.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Sandy Versus Katrina