John Hinderaker wont admit it, but I think he haz a sad. It was inevitable, considering that a mere two weeks ago the Power Line co-founder, who manages to store within the same cranium litigation abilities that got him named one of the 100 best lawyers in Minnesota and all the impulse control and political insight of a hyperactive four-year-old, was on an intense sugar high after W. Mitt Romneys performance in the first presidential debate.
Hinderaker is a guy you might assume is simply too intelligent to believe the utter crap he writes, but time and time again he actually comes off as a sincere believer in the unbelievable and a zealot for the very worst of what the right wing would do to the nation if given an unfettered chance. Hinderaker believes, or would at least have you believe he believes, that Paul Krugman is a full-time shill for the Obama administration, that Dick Cheney oozed competence, and that Barack Obama is a world-class liar.
So his giddy appraisal of Romneys handling of his first debate against President Obama, while essentially being a patchwork of falsehoods much like his candidates performance, was to be expected:
It wasnt a TKO, it was a knockout. Mitt Romney was in control from the beginning. He was the alpha male, while Barack Obama was weak, hesitant, stuttering, often apologetic