Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Post Debate Male Pundits Speak for Women Voters and Get It All Wrong
Post Debate Male Pundits Speak for Women Voters and Get It All Wrong
Romneys condescending attitude toward women was bad enough last night, but what really got me was listening to male pundits discuss how women voters were no doubt put off by the petty bickering of the two candidates. Just two weeks ago, they were telling us that Romney won over female voters by being an alpha male, but suddenly when the President engages in the fight, its off-putting to us, according to them.
I wasnt focused on how they spoke to each other, though petty is not a word I would use for a fight that the media brought on with their two week weak passive beating of Obama. I was too busy thinking about how Romney wouldnt answer the question on gun control (neither candidate wanted to go near that one) and how he so easily slipped into blaming single mothers for the problem of gun violence. I was stunned by his comments about women in binders he clearly assumes that women are so dumb they wont hear what he didnt say about his actual policy of not supporting equal pay. And I felt nothing but solidarity with Candy Crowley when he attempted to shame and belittle her for doing her job.
So, no. I wasnt thinking about how petty it was for the two candidates to be fighting it out that is what the media demanded. They wanted good TV and they got it. Some of us were actually listening to the policies in the first debate and were none too impressed with Mitt Romneys bully routine, but the media wanted bully boys they made that clear when they crowned Romney, who brayed and lied his way through the entire debate the winner. This, in and of itself, reeks of patriarchal values and they cant even see it.
Less concerned with a boxing match to appease the medias need for ratings through election season or how impressed they are by regressive alpha male behavior, I was worried about my friends who are single mothers. I was thinking about what my best friend would do without Planned Parenthood for her cervical cancer screening. I was imagining being one of those women in a binder and wondering how Romney treated the women who worked for him. I was thinking I would not want to work for that man. And then I thought I dont want that man to work for me, represent me.
-snip-
Full article here: http://www.politicususa.com/post-debate-male-pundits-pretend-speak-women-voters.html
A Good Read
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1418 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post Debate Male Pundits Speak for Women Voters and Get It All Wrong (Original Post)
Tx4obama
Oct 2012
OP
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)1. brayed and lied his way through the entire debate – the “winner”. reeks of patriarchal values
right on... to it all
Blue Owl
(50,522 posts)2. And here I thought Chuck Todd was every woman...
Kidding, of course...
flamingdem
(39,331 posts)3. Ah good point, I was kinda buying into the "women don't like fighting" meme
That is BS to criticize Obama as usual.
hoosierlib
(710 posts)4. Bravo!
Well put...
bemildred
(90,061 posts)5. Something to notice:
Obama does not try to outshout Rmoney, what he does is stand in the way and keep talking, so Rmoney did not get the floor, or freedom to be heard when it was not his turn, and he is presented with the choice of being more egregious in his disrespect or giving up, which he eventually did, in each case when resistance persisted. That's how you do it, it leaves the blame evidently where it belongs.