Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 07:39 AM Sep 2012

Drone Warfare's Deadly Civilian Toll: A Very Personal View

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/09/20-3


A US Predator drone in Afghanistan. The strike in Somalia means armed drones are operating in six countries. (Photograph: Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images)

I find myself caught between the need to follow the drone debate and the need to avoid unpleasant memories it stirs. I used drones – unmanned aerial vehicles – during the nadir of my military career that was an operational tour in Afghanistan. I remember cuing up a US Predator strike before deciding the computer screen wasn't depicting a Taliban insurgent burying an improvised explosive device in the road; rather, a child playing in the dirt.

After returning from Afghanistan at the end of 2009, I left the British army in 2010. I wanted to put as much distance as I could between myself and the UK, leaving to study in America (where I still reside). By doing so, I inadvertently placed myself in the country that is spearheading development in drone technology and use, highlighted by each report of a drone strike and the usual attendant civilian casualties.

Political theorist Hannah Arendt described the history of warfare in the 20th century as the growing incapacity of the army to fulfil its basic function: defending the civilian population. My experiences in Afghanistan brought this issue to a head, leaving me unable to avoid the realization that my role as a soldier had changed, in Arendt's words, from "that of protector into that of a belated and essentially futile avenger". Our collective actions in Iraq and Afghanistan after 9/11 were, and remain, futile vengeance – with drones the latest technological advance to empower that flawed strategy.

Drones are becoming the preferred instruments of vengeance, and their core purpose is analogous to the changing relationship between civil society and warfare, in which the latter is conducted remotely and at a safe distance so that implementing death and murder becomes increasingly palatable.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Drone Warfare's Deadly Civilian Toll: A Very Personal View (Original Post) xchrom Sep 2012 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Sep 2012 #1
I doubt most Americans would favor foreign military drones on our soil rachel1 Sep 2012 #2
Wholesale killing cbrer Sep 2012 #3

Response to xchrom (Original post)

rachel1

(538 posts)
2. I doubt most Americans would favor foreign military drones on our soil
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 04:18 PM
Sep 2012

killing Americans without due process.

I wonder how the people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, etc. feel about the drone strikes targeting their people...

 

cbrer

(1,831 posts)
3. Wholesale killing
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 05:25 PM
Sep 2012

Can become impersonal. And "safer" for the "friendlies". This technology is already in use in the CONUS.

Escalation will demand that their use expand beyond reconnaisance and become weaponized. War on terror you know...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Drone Warfare's Deadly Ci...