Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,191 posts)
Wed Apr 3, 2024, 02:06 PM Apr 3

States' rights argument on border echos slavery battle

By Sean Kim Butorac / For the Chicago Tribune

In November, the Texas legislature enacted Senate Bill 4 to empower state law enforcement to arrest suspected undocumented immigrants. First-time offenders face six months of imprisonment, while second-timers can be incarcerated for up to 20 years.

Texas prisons are already overcrowded, inhumane spaces. During last year’s heat wave, more than 40 prisoners died when temperatures in some prisons skyrocketed above 130 degrees. Undocumented immigrants would have to choose deportation to avoid these conditions.

Though framed in racially neutral terms, S.B. 4 is unmistakably racist. Like earlier laws, S.B. 4 would authorize further racial profiling of Latinos — including citizens and permanent residents — by law enforcement, well beyond the border.

S.B. 4 is a disastrous rejection of settled law. Historically, immigration enforcement has been a federal power, and the Supreme Court has affirmed this position. This tracks with the vision of the Framers, who anticipated the federal government should regulate the nation’s borders.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-states-rights-argument-on-border-echos-slavery-battle/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»States' rights argument o...