Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Evangelicals must be on board with the bloodbath talk, because they're silent.
https://signalpress.blogspot.com/2024/03/hey-evangelical-leaders-are-you-on.htmlAt this point, after the news of Trump's "bloodbath" remarks have had a chance to sink in, I can imagine evangelical church leaders who have sold out to him frantically searching their Old Testament for historical passages to twist into some kind of justification of what he has said. That's been the pattern for his conservative Christian supporters ever since he sucked them in and took over their churches and denominations, replacing the Christian gospel with political rhetoric.
As Trump sinks further into a miasma of mental decline and personal hysterics, and his remarks become more and more extreme, and he loses support by the day, the response of his far right Evangelical supporters is silence. No comment. Tacit justification and occasional prooftexting old historical accounts from Jewish history that bear no relevance at all on what the response should be from those who claim to believe in, and follow the Christian gospel.
If they're with him, and many of them are, because they do not pay any heed at all to the principles of the Christian gospel, or to Christ's teaching, but they go back to a historical period of time, long before the Christian covenant was established by Jesus, and try to justify violence because it's "in the Bible." Some of them know better. Others, in their Biblical "literalism" and fundamentalism, take each section of the Bible literally without applying any historical context to it. So they'll cite King David triumphing over the Philistines, or the thwarting of attacks by the Assyrians as justification for their desire to enforce their way of thinking on everyone else, violently if they think it is necessary.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 593 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Evangelicals must be on board with the bloodbath talk, because they're silent. (Original Post)
lees1975
Mar 16
OP
Irish_Dem
(47,140 posts)1. People who think they speak for God can be quite dangerous.
Violence is acceptable because it is what God wants.
ret5hd
(20,501 posts)4. Let's be very precise:
Violence is acceptable because it is what THEY want and oh so conveniently, THEIR gawd just oh so conveniently happens to agree with them.
msongs
(67,420 posts)2. 2000 years of bloodbaths sorta predicts a response nt
Deuxcents
(16,248 posts)3. The flock should lead the shepherd and get straight with their gods.
GreenWave
(6,759 posts)5. Their brains are twisted in a knot which prevents them...
... from reading the word "not"
Thou shalt not kill.