Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lees1975

(3,861 posts)
Sat Mar 16, 2024, 11:24 PM Mar 16

Evangelicals must be on board with the bloodbath talk, because they're silent.

https://signalpress.blogspot.com/2024/03/hey-evangelical-leaders-are-you-on.html

At this point, after the news of Trump's "bloodbath" remarks have had a chance to sink in, I can imagine evangelical church leaders who have sold out to him frantically searching their Old Testament for historical passages to twist into some kind of justification of what he has said. That's been the pattern for his conservative Christian supporters ever since he sucked them in and took over their churches and denominations, replacing the Christian gospel with political rhetoric.

As Trump sinks further into a miasma of mental decline and personal hysterics, and his remarks become more and more extreme, and he loses support by the day, the response of his far right Evangelical supporters is silence. No comment. Tacit justification and occasional prooftexting old historical accounts from Jewish history that bear no relevance at all on what the response should be from those who claim to believe in, and follow the Christian gospel.

If they're with him, and many of them are, because they do not pay any heed at all to the principles of the Christian gospel, or to Christ's teaching, but they go back to a historical period of time, long before the Christian covenant was established by Jesus, and try to justify violence because it's "in the Bible." Some of them know better. Others, in their Biblical "literalism" and fundamentalism, take each section of the Bible literally without applying any historical context to it. So they'll cite King David triumphing over the Philistines, or the thwarting of attacks by the Assyrians as justification for their desire to enforce their way of thinking on everyone else, violently if they think it is necessary.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Evangelicals must be on board with the bloodbath talk, because they're silent. (Original Post) lees1975 Mar 16 OP
People who think they speak for God can be quite dangerous. Irish_Dem Mar 16 #1
Let's be very precise: ret5hd Mar 17 #4
2000 years of bloodbaths sorta predicts a response nt msongs Mar 16 #2
The flock should lead the shepherd and get straight with their gods. Deuxcents Mar 17 #3
Their brains are twisted in a knot which prevents them... GreenWave Mar 17 #5

Irish_Dem

(47,140 posts)
1. People who think they speak for God can be quite dangerous.
Sat Mar 16, 2024, 11:31 PM
Mar 16

Violence is acceptable because it is what God wants.

ret5hd

(20,501 posts)
4. Let's be very precise:
Sun Mar 17, 2024, 12:42 AM
Mar 17

Violence is acceptable because it is what THEY want…and oh so conveniently, THEIR gawd just oh so conveniently happens to agree with them.

GreenWave

(6,759 posts)
5. Their brains are twisted in a knot which prevents them...
Sun Mar 17, 2024, 03:52 AM
Mar 17

... from reading the word "not"

Thou shalt not kill.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Evangelicals must be on b...