Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
Mon Jul 9, 2012, 05:53 PM Jul 2012

After Five Years: Report Card on Crisis Capitalism

After five years of crisis - with no end in sight - it's time to evaluate what happened, why and what needs to be done. One key cause of this crisis is the class structure of capitalist enterprises. I stress that because most treatments miss it. By class structure, I mean enterprises' internal organization pitting workers against corporate boards of directors and major shareholders. Those boards seek first to maximize corporate profits and growth. That means maximizing the difference between the value they get from workers' labor and the value of the wages paid to workers. Those boards also decide how to use that difference ("surplus value&quot to secure the corporation's reproduction and growth. The major shareholders and the directors they select make all basic corporate decisions: what, how and where to produce and how to spend the surplus value (on executive pay hikes and bonuses, outsourcing production, buying politicians etc.) Workers (the majority) live with the results of decisions made by a tiny minority (shareholders and directors). Workers are excluded from participating in those decisions: a lesson in capitalist democracy.

US capitalism changed in the 1970s. The prior century of labor shortages had required real wage increases every decade (to bring in immigrant workers). In the 1970s, many capitalists installed labor-saving computers, while others relocated production to lower-wage countries. Demand for US laborers fell. Simultaneously, women moved massively into wage work as did new immigrants from Latin America. The supply of laborers in the US rose. Capitalists no longer needed to raise real wages, so they stopped doing so. Since the 1970s, what capitalists paid workers stayed the same. Meanwhile, computers helped labor productivity to rise: what workers produced for capitalists to sell kept increasing. Surplus value (and profits), therefore, soared (stock market boom, rising financial sector etc.) while the wage portion of national product/income fell.

By making these changes, US capitalism provoked a classic contradiction/problem for itself. It paid insufficient wages to enable workers to purchase growing capitalist output. The solution, led by the fast-growing financial sector, was two-fold. First, it cycled rising corporate profits partly into major new consumer lending (mortgages; car loans; credit cards; and, later, student loans). Rising consumer debt sustained growing mass consumption despite stagnant wages, and so postponed an otherwise certain economic downturn. Second, financiers promoted profitable new investments for corporations and the rich (securities based on consumer debts and credit default swaps that insured such securities). Financial corporations displaced non-financial corporations as dominant in the US economy. Financial transactions based on consumer debts built on stagnant wages (the ultimate means to service that debt): those fruits of capitalist decisions brought the "2007 crash." (What is widely known as the crash of 2008 technically began in the fourth quarter of 2007.) The crisis nightmare began: a cyclical downturn coupled to long-run decline in workers' purchasing power.

As the crisis deepened, capitalists and mainstream economists insisted that it was "only a financial problem" - credit had frozen because banks did not trust one another and stopped lending. The credit freeze would be "easily managed" by federal bailouts of financial and a few other corporations (e.g. GM) deemed "too big to fail." Dutiful politicians funded those bailouts with massive government borrowing from (rather than taxing) the large cash hoards accumulating in the hands of banks, large corporations and the rich. They hoarded, they explained, because lending to or investing in the economy they had crashed was "too risky." Instead of making their hoards available to individuals and businesses that might have revived the economy, financial capitalists lent them to the government to bail out those same capitalists: a lesson in capitalist efficiency.

http://truth-out.org/news/item/10190-after-five-years-report-card-on-crisis-capitalism

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Five Years: Report Card on Crisis Capitalism (Original Post) MindMover Jul 2012 OP
'By making these changes, US capitalism provoked a classic contradiction/problem for itself.' xchrom Jul 2012 #1
Excellent read IMO!!! n/t RKP5637 Jul 2012 #2
very good. limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #3

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
1. 'By making these changes, US capitalism provoked a classic contradiction/problem for itself.'
Mon Jul 9, 2012, 05:59 PM
Jul 2012

i'm not sure they thought of it that way -- austrian economics -- neo liberalism is a known quantity by this time.

maybe they did -- but i'm skeptical.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
3. very good.
Tue Jul 10, 2012, 02:33 AM
Jul 2012

This presents one way for sure the whole crisis could have been avoided if we did what he says we should have done like 30 years prior. I'm not quite following him on the concept that a liberal Keynesian solution will not work right now to get the economy moving in the immediate term. Especially when we need the investment now for clean renewable energy. But I agree with this author that in the long run to prevent future crises we will need to expand democracy into the corporate realm.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»After Five Years: Report ...