Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

geefloyd46

(1,939 posts)
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 09:09 AM Jun 2012

Resolve to Overturn 'Citizens United' Spreads Through the States | The Nation

Writing for the majority in the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, Justice Anthony Kennedy argued that independent expenditures by corporations “do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.”

Since then, Super-PACs and corporations have spent record amounts of money in elections nationwide. Corporate spending soared during the 2010 election cycle to $294 million, 427 percent over the previous midterm elections in 2006. Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Stephen Breyer both suggested that given these “huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates’ allegiance,” Kennedy’s assertion doesn’t hold and the court should reconsider its ruling.

...People don’t want to see a repeat of Wisconsin, where more than $63 million was spent in the recall election ($50 million went to Walker)—much of it from out of state, including $24 million from outside groups. Local public officials also realize that they can’t raise the kind of resources a handpicked, corporate-favored candidate can now access. There is also an obscenely exorbitant presidential campaign on the horizon with a price tag expected to reach $2 billion or more, including hundreds of millions of dollars flowing in from wealthy and corporate interests. In May alone, conservative groups spent $20 million in just nine swing states and Michigan.

Legislators have clearly reached their own conclusion that there is an “appearance of corruption.” Twenty-two states and the District of Columbia have joined Montana in asking the Supreme Court to uphold the state’s ban on corporate expenditures. This coalition is a mix of red, blue, and purple states, including New York, Arkansas, California, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia. Senators John McCain and Sheldon Whitehouse also filed an amicus brief in support of Montana,writing, “Evidence from the 2010 and 2012 electoral cycles has demonstrated that so-called independent expenditures create a strong potential for corruption and the perception thereof.”

This Resolutions Week, many members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, including co-chairs Raúl M. Grijalva and Keith Ellison, are supporting city and town councils and state legislatures as they push for a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United. Local efforts will be held across the nation: from Baker City, Oregon, to Huntsville, Alabama; Wichita, Kansas, to Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania; Provo, Utah, to Corpus Christi, Texas. Dozens of localities have already approved similar resolutions.

post is here: http://laborspains.blogspot.com/2012/06/resolve-to-overturn-citizens-united.html
Original post: http://www.thenation.com/blog/168346/resolve-overturn-citizens-united-spreads-through-states

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Resolve to Overturn 'Citizens United' Spreads Through the States | The Nation (Original Post) geefloyd46 Jun 2012 OP
This looks promising longship Jun 2012 #1
I'm sure they will turn it around 2pooped2pop Jun 2012 #2
Have any of the Supremes ever commented on public reaction to this preposterous ruling? summerschild Jun 2012 #3
It isn't as if this is/was rocket science; needing to be proven, common sense and basic logic Uncle Joe Jun 2012 #4

summerschild

(725 posts)
3. Have any of the Supremes ever commented on public reaction to this preposterous ruling?
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:19 AM
Jun 2012

I've searched and searched and (except for now retired Justice Stevens) haven't found one word from any of Roberts' henchmen.

Other than Alito's display of headshaking and mouthing during the State of the Union address, I've never seen or heard a word from these turds about this assault on democracy.

Uncle Joe

(58,431 posts)
4. It isn't as if this is/was rocket science; needing to be proven, common sense and basic logic
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 01:17 PM
Jun 2012

screamed this would be the case.

Money and power on an unlimited scale are corruptive influences, people have known this for thousands of years!



Legislators have clearly reached their own conclusion that there is an “appearance of corruption.” Twenty-two states and the District of Columbia have joined Montana in asking the Supreme Court to uphold the state’s ban on corporate expenditures. This coalition is a mix of red, blue, and purple states, including New York, Arkansas, California, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia. Senators John McCain and Sheldon Whitehouse also filed an amicus brief in support of Montana,writing, “Evidence from the 2010 and 2012 electoral cycles has demonstrated that so-called independent expenditures create a strong potential for corruption and the perception thereof.”



Thanks for the thread, geefloyd.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Resolve to Overturn 'Citi...