Why Elites Fail
http://www.thenation.com/article/168265/why-elites-failJPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer James Dimon, center, flanked by Goldman Sachs & Co. Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Lloyd C. Blankfein, left, and Bank of New York Mellon Chairman Chief Executive Officer Robert Kelly, are seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Feb. 11, 2009, during a House Financial Services Committee hearing. (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)
***SNIP
But the problem with my alma mater is that over time, the mechanisms of meritocracy have broken down. In 1995, when I was a student at Hunter, the student body was 12 percent black and 6 percent Hispanic. Not coincidentally, there was no test-prep industry for the Hunter entrance exam. Thats no longer the case. Now, so-called cram schools like Elite Academy in Queens can charge thousands of dollars for after-school and weekend courses where sixth graders memorize vocabulary words and learn advanced math. Meanwhile, in the wealthier precincts of Manhattan, parents can hire $90-an-hour private tutors for one-on-one sessions with their children.
By 2009, Hunters demographics were radically differentjust 3 percent black and 1 percent Hispanic, according to the New York Times. With the rise of a sophisticated and expensive test-preparation industry, the means of selecting entrants to Hunter has grown less independent of the social and economic hierarchies in New York at large. The pyramid of merit has come to mirror the pyramid of wealth and cultural capital.
How and why does this happen? I think the best answer comes from the work of a social theorist named Robert Michels, who was occupied with a somewhat parallel problem in the early years of the last century. Born to a wealthy German family, Michels came to adopt the radical socialist politics then sweeping through much of Europe. At first, he joined the Social Democratic Party, but he ultimately came to view it as too bureaucratic to achieve its stated aims. Our workers organization has become an end in itself, Michels declared, a machine which is perfected for its own sake and not for the tasks which it could have performed.
Michels then drifted toward the syndicalists, who eschewed parliamentary elections in favor of mass labor solidarity, general strikes and resistance to the dictatorship of the kaiser. But even among the more militant factions of the German left, Michels encountered the same bureaucratic pathologies that had soured him on the SDP. In his classic book Political Parties, he wondered why the parties of the left, so ideologically committed to democracy and participation, were as oligarchic in their functioning as the self-consciously elitist and aristocratic parties of the right.
Not bad.
To test is to measure, and to measure is to judge. The earlier you start the testing, the more you leave the kids dependent on the birth lottery.
SharonAnn
(13,778 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)That is what they are for, and the excuse is "efficiency", and it is wrong to do that, kids future development is not predictable based on testing, never has been, never will be, and it's not deterministic in the first place, and the tests only measure narrow skill sets.
Shagman
(135 posts)As they rise through the hierarchy, people go from making decisions based on fact to setting goals and mandating that the facts must alter to fit them. In other words, they go from allowing for reality to defining their own reality.
You see it in every business above a certain size. Management stops listening to their workers, the people who actually have to do the work. They see only their own goals and not what has to happen to meet those goals. Eventually reality catches up, the goals can't possibly be met, and the business fails.
And with an MBA they can bypass the whole fact-based stage and go straight through to magical thinking. They're relying less and less on reality-based considerations, and that's one reason the American economy is going into the toilet.