National Security State Wins (Again): Why the Real Victor in Campaign 2012 Won’t Be Obama or Romney

[marmar]

from TomDispatch:



The National Security State Wins (Again)
Why the Real Victor in Campaign 2012 Won’t Be Obama or Romney

By William J. Astore


Now that Mitt Romney is the presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, the media is already handicapping the presidential election big time, and the neck-and-neck opinion polls are pouring in. But whether President Obama gets his second term or Romney enters the Oval Office, there’s a third candidate no one’s paying much attention to, and that candidate is guaranteed to be the one clear winner of election 2012: the U.S. military and our ever-surging national security state.

The reasons are easy enough to explain. Despite his record as a “warrior-president,” despite the breathless “Obama got Osama” campaign boosterism, common inside-the-Beltway wisdom has it that the president has backed himself into a national security corner. He must continue to appear strong and uncompromising on defense or else he’ll get the usual Democrat-as-war-wimp label tattooed on his arm by the Republicans.

Similarly, to have a realistic chance of defeating him -- so goes American political thinking -- candidate Romney must be seen as even stronger and more uncompromising, a hawk among hawks. Whatever military spending Obama calls for, however much he caters to neo-conservative agendas, however often he confesses his undying love for and extols the virtues of our troops, Romney will surpass him with promises of even more military spending, an even more muscular and interventionist foreign policy, and an even deeper love of our troops.

Indeed, with respect to the national security complex, candidate Romney already comes across like Edward G. Robinson’s Johnny Rocco in the classic film Key Largo: he knows he wants one thing, and that thing is more. More ships for the Navy. More planes for the Air Force. More troops in general -- perhaps 100,000 more. And much more spending on national defense. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175542/tomgram%3A_william_astore%2C_hail_to_the_cheerleader-in-chief!/#more

[Jackpine Radical]

1. I'd replace the phrase "National Security State" with one word:

Empire.

The military, and the militarized police, and the beefed-up Homeland Security system all serve the interests of Empire. Keep the oil flowing, and suppress any opposition, at home or abroad, to the American Hegemony.