'We're Thinking About Covid-19 The Wrong Way. It's Not A 'Wave'- It's A Wildfire'
- 'We're thinking about Covid-19 the wrong way. It's not a 'wave' – it's a wildfire.'- Like a fire, the virus relentlessly seeks out its fuel, humans, and will keep spreading as long as it has access to that. Opinion. By Michael T Osterholm, Mark Olshaker. The Guardian, Aug. 4, 2020.
We have no previous experience with a worldwide coronavirus pandemic, so when Sars-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, began spreading, public health experts leaned on our experiences with influenza pandemics to inform their predictions. These pandemics are often described in terms of “waves” and “troughs”. We have now seen enough to replace the ocean analogy with a better one: wildfire.
Like a wildfire, the virus relentlessly seeks out fuel (human hosts), devastating some areas while sparing others. It will continue spreading until we achieve sufficient herd immunity – when 50 to 70% of the population has developed protective antibodies – to significantly slow transmission. We will achieve herd immunity either through widespread infection or an effective and widely available vaccine. No amount of official happy talk will change that course.
We now have compelling evidence that Sars-CoV-2 is not affected by seasonality or regional weather; it spreads by the human contact and mixing that occurs in areas of high population density. We don’t yet know whether immunity is permanent or short-lived. We also don’t know if a vaccine, if and when we develop one, will be a bull’s-eye success like the vaccines for polio or measles, or more of a hope-for-the-best agent like seasonal flu vaccine. We hope vaccine development efforts will prove effective, but hope is not a strategy. Like HIV, Sars-Cov-2 is here to stay, and realism must inform our strategic response.
Studies of previous pandemics, wars and other times of intense national stress show that people react most calmly and effectively when leadership tells them the truth, even if that truth is frightening. If you don’t have answers, say so; tell the public what you’re doing to learn more. So far, the United States has largely seen the opposite approach: moving-target messaging that is often scientifically erroneous, irrationally optimistic and leaves the public in desperate confusion over who and what to believe, with science the first casualty. We must focus our message on scientific facts.
In the coming months, US morbidity & mortality will largely depend on how much fuel the Covid-19 wildfire has access to...
- Read More, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/04/coronavirus-pandemic-wave-wildfire
------------
- Michael T Osterholm is Regents professor and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. Mark Olshaker is a writer and documentary film-maker. They are the authors of Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs.
- 'You’re already wearing a mask- now consider a face shield & goggles.' Op., Adrienne Matei, The Guardian, 8/1/20.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/01/face-shields-goggles-eye-protection-coronavirus
= new reply since forum marked as read
