Trump's Remarks on Proposed National Environmental Policy Act Regulations: January 9, 2020
Remarks by President Trump on Proposed National Environmental Policy Act Regulations
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
Issued on: January 9, 2020
Roosevelt Room
11:19 A.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning, everyone.
PARTICIPANTS: Good morning.
{snip}
After years of stagnation, real wages have increased nearly 10 percent for low-income workers the biggest beneficiaries. Our regulation cuts are giving the average American household an extra $3,000 per year. And if you look at the tax cuts and all of the other cuts, its close to $10,000 a year with all of the cuts that were getting. And thats for an average median-income family $10,000.
You know, Ive talked about past administrations the one was $475, and the other one was $975 the last two, $975. And were $10,000, and the number is actually higher that than that, if you include certain regulations that we got cut. So thats an amazing thing, and thats one of the reasons consumers are doing so well and leading us so strongly in this boom that were in.
But this is just the beginning. Well not stop until our nations gleaming new infrastructure has made America the envy of the world again. It used to be the envy of the world, and now were like a third-world country. Its really sad. You get approval they even get financing for jobs, and then they cant build them for 15 years, and then it ends up costing five times more than it was supposed to cost.
{snip}
ADMINISTRATOR WHEELER: Thank you, Mr. President. Im pleased to be here today to celebrate yet another promise this President has fulfilled: to update the NEPA regulations.
This year marks the 50th anniversary of both the EPA and the NEPA law. A lot has changed over the last 50 years, and we have made tremendous progress in protecting both the environment and growing our economy. From 1970 to 2018, the emissions of the six criteria air pollutants have decreased by 74 percent, and all six have gone down during the Trump administration. Likewise, on the water side: In 1970, over 40 percent of our nations drinking water systems failed to meet the EPA standards.
Today, over 92 percent of all water systems meet the EPA standards every single day. And at the same time, our economy has grown by 275 percent, with record-breaking growth over the last three years.
{snip}
Im going to Ohio in a little while. We have crowds of people that for, two and a half, three days, have been standing out in the cold. I dont know how they do it. Theyre strong people. But theyve been out there, and its pretty much zero degrees. And its a great state. And we have a tremendous crowd, so I look forward to that. Ill be leaving in a little while.
{snip}
But phase one was is a phenomenal deal. Could be up to $50 billion in farm product. So thats something that the most they ever did was $16 billion. So they go from $16 billion to up to $50 billion. So thats numerous times more than they were buying in the past. Its going to have a huge impact. And I see farm prices are going way up. I see corn is just had some big increases over the last little while. Cattle has been doing really well. And the farmers liked me anyway. Thats what I like about the farmers. (Laughter.)
But you know what I did do and you know this better than anybody I got I was able they were targeted by China. You know look, China is negotiating. I dont blame them. But they were targeted. They say, You know, the farmers like Trump so well target the farmers. And they did. And the first year was $12 billion, and I took $12 billion and I asked Sonny Perdue, Secretary of Agriculture, What do you think, Sonny? He said, Its $12 billion. And I think that wouldve caused tremendous consternation. And they were hit for $12 billion, and I took $12 billion out of the tariffs.
We had tens of billions of dollars left over; I gave it to the farmers. The next year it was $16 billion. I took $16 billion out of the tariffs; I gave it to the farmers. So the farmers did pretty well, and now theyre doing great. And the prices are going up very substantially, and China is kicking in. China has already started to buy. Japan the deal is done. They have been buying. Its a $40 billion deal.
But the big question I have is whether or not the farmers will be able to supply that much. Because its much more than its the biggest contract ever signed. So I think itll be great for the farmers, but also great for regulatory, great for banks. You know that. Great for finance companies. Really, a lot.
{snip}
Q Mr. President, Im sure you saw Mike Lees comments. Did your national security team really say that it would be wrong for Congress to debate military action on Iran?
THE PRESIDENT: So heres what happened on that: I had calls from numerous senators and numerous congressmen and women, saying it was the greatest presentation theyve ever had.
{snip}
Q Mr. President, Im sure you saw Mike Lees comments. Did your national security team really say that it would be wrong for Congress to debate military action on Iran?
THE PRESIDENT: So heres what happened on that: I had calls from numerous senators and numerous congressmen and women, saying it was the greatest presentation theyve ever had.
{snip}
Q Mr. President, you said Iran was trying to blow up the embassy in Baghdad. Can you provide more details on what that plot was?
THE PRESIDENT: No, I think it was obvious. If you look at the protests and this was the anti-Benghazi. This was Benghazi was a disaster. They showed up a long time after it took place. They saw burning embers from days before.
I said, Get out today, immediately. They were saying, We think we can have them tomorrow. I said, Nope. They got to go right now. And they were on their way very quickly. And they got there almost I mean, they got there quickly.
They could have done that with Benghazi too, by the way. Same same thing. Had they gotten there had they done what I did, you wouldnt have had you wouldnt know the name Benghazi. It would not be a very famous name. Now its a very famous name.
{snip}
Q Have you gotten any indication from them that they might do more?
THE PRESIDENT: Yeah. I spoke to them yesterday. I spoke to the Secretary General yesterday, and we had a great conversation. He was very I think he was actually excited by it.
And I actually had a name NATO, right? And then you have M.E. Middle East. Youll call it NATOME. I said, What a beautiful name. NATOME. Im good at names, right? USMCA. Like the song, YMCA. (Laughter.) Everybody nobody could remember USMCA. I said, Think of the song, YMCA.' Now everybody says it. They dont remember the previous name of the bad deal, okay commonly known as NAFTA.
{snip}
So I think that NATO should be expanded and we should include the Middle East. Absolutely. And we pay for a big percentage of NATO.
And by the way, if you look at and speak to Secretary General Stoltenberg whos doing a terrific job, by the way he will tell you that I raised $130 billion more than they were getting. It was going down from past administrations every single year. It was down to a very low number. I came in. I said, You got to pay, folks. You got to pay. Were working with you. Were protecting you. Were a part of this. You got to pay. We dont want to be the fools, like we have been for so many years.
So we raised $130 billion almost immediately. We had a meeting with all of the countries. I said, You got to pay. I mean, I can imagine they dont like me as much as Obama and other people. But they got to pay. Were protecting; you got to pay. We got $130 billion more more. Not $130 [billion]; $130 [billion] more.
{snip}
THE PRESIDENT: Its a big number. And I, to this day, say, I wonder if it mattered, because I never noticed myself getting any credit for that. I did; I spent a lot of my own money. You know, tens of millions of dollars, times a lot. But I spent a lot of my own money.
And I always asked the question. I said, I wonder if it was necessary. Because I dont think anybody even knew that I was spending it. Id mention it every once in a while, but I dont for instance, I give up my salary. Its $450,000 approximately $450,000 presidential salary. I give it up. It goes to usually, I give it to drugs. I give some to Elaine, sometimes, for transportation.
But every quarter I think its paid on a quarterly basis I give up 100 percent of my salary that I make as President. I dont think anybody has written that story. You guys dont want to write that kind of a story, but thats okay with me.
{snip}
END
12:06 P.M. EST
Trump pushes some extremely dubious numbers about median household income during his term. See a fact-check here: https://www.factcheck.org/2019/11/trumps-shaky-5000-boast/
Link to tweet
Moostache
(9,897 posts)Hey Trumpy Bear, I have a follow-up question for you...
Since you are soooooooooooooooo rich and sooooooooooooooooo magnanimous, why are we, the people and tax payers, footing the bills for security for your idiot children and their travels on behalf of YOUR PRIVATE business? Don't you think YOU should pay for THAT?
While we're at it...why don't you also pay for all the trips to that rathole in Florida that you spend about 40% of your time at? I thought you would be "too damn busy working" to golf?
Otherwise, please have a stroke and die today...
Ohiogal
(32,055 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,600 posts)Tuesday, October 22, 2019: Pence's Remarks on the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement - Duryea, PA: October 21, 2019
Ummmmmm, no:
Trump is retweeting bizarrely false numbers from @bennyjohnson
Kevin M. Kruse Retweeted
The president is retweeting bizarrely false numbers from @bennyjohnson
Here's the chart of median household income in the Trump years. It's up $600, not $6000. And up $3500 between 2009 and 2016, not $800
Link to tweet
Correction, the president's false stat about the Obama years was $1000. Still false, but differently false from the $800 that I mistakenly transcribed.
Link to tweet