Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,986 posts)
Fri Jan 3, 2020, 03:05 PM Jan 2020

Trump has raised strategic incoherence to new levels with Soleimani's killing

by Jennifer Rubin

The Post reports: “Iran on Friday vowed ‘severe revenge’ in response to a U.S. airstrike that killed Tehran’s most powerful military commander, Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani, and dramatically sharpened tensions across the Middle East.” The Trump administration announced that the move was a defensive action responding to militia attacks on our Baghdad embassy, but then promptly announced all Americans should leave Iraq. Are we putting Americans at greater risk or protecting them? That is one of dozens of questions that Congress, allies, pundits and ordinary Americans are asking.

Less than seven months ago, Trump pulled back a strike force poised to respond to Iran’s shoot-down of an American drone. Less than three months ago Trump abandoned the Kurds and announced a retreat from Syria to end “forever wars.” Troops did not come home as Trump promised, and indeed, did not all leave Syria, yet another reversal.

With the assassination of Soleimani, who has orchestrated killings of hundreds of American forces and extended Iranian influence throughout the region, the administration raised the prospects for military conflict in the region while subsequently claiming to be de-escalating the chances of war. “U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that he discussed the operation afterwards with British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab and Chinese Politburo Member Yang Jiechi, telling them that ‘the U.S. remains committed to de-escalation,’” The Post reports.

All of these conversations apparently took place before Congress had been briefed, drawing a strong rebuke from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). “Tonight’s airstrike risks provoking further dangerous escalation of violence. America — and the world — cannot afford to have tensions escalate to the point of no return,” she said in a written statement Thursday night. She emphasized that the killing was undertaken “without the consultation of the Congress.” She demanded, “The full Congress must be immediately briefed on this serious situation and on the next steps under consideration by the Administration, including the significant escalation of the deployment of additional troops to the region.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/trump-has-raised-strategic-incoherence-to-new-levels-with-soleimani-s-killing/ar-BBYAnFe?ocid=msn360

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump has raised strategic incoherence to new levels with Soleimani's killing (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2020 OP
And once again leftieNanner Jan 2020 #1
Trump jdl123 Jan 2020 #2

leftieNanner

(15,100 posts)
1. And once again
Fri Jan 3, 2020, 03:08 PM
Jan 2020

The response from Congressional Republicans is:


CRICKETS!!!

You guys all fine with this? You think this was a great idea? You think WWIII is gonna be fun? Let's initiate the military draft - and YOUR KIDS ARE FIRST IN LINE.

jdl123

(21 posts)
2. Trump
Fri Jan 3, 2020, 03:18 PM
Jan 2020

He is trying to change the news cycle and public opinion from his administrations corruption. A long time ago, people were posting that they were afraid trump would start a war to deflect attention from his corrupt administration. Well, here it is. My opinion.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump has raised strategi...