'Citizens United Broke Our Democracy One Decade Ago. It Never Recovered.'
Last edited Mon Dec 30, 2019, 06:36 PM - Edit history (2)
'Citizens United Broke Our Democracy One Decade Ago. It Never Recovered.' Igor Derysh/Salon, Truthout, Dec, 29, 2019. Excerpts:
The election of President Donald Trump will likely define this decade, but the breakdown in our political system which sowed deeper partisan divisions and ultimately paved the way for his White House victory can be traced back to a single January day almost exactly ten years ago. On Jan. 21, 2010, then-Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy cast the deciding vote in the Citizens United case, which was brought by a group chaired by David Bossie, who would later serve as Trumps deputy campaign manager. Kennedy wrote in the majority decision that limits on independent expenditures violated the First Amendment rights of corporations and other groups, effectively overturning spending restrictions dating back more than a century.
The Citizens United ruling was later compounded by Republican efforts to block transparency rules, Federal Election Commission rulings and further court decisions like McCutcheon v. FEC, paving the way for the creation of super PACs, or committees which can spend unlimited sums of money to promote or oppose candidates while hiding the identities of their donors. The impact of the Citizens United ruling and subsequent campaign finance changes are undeniable. In 2010, the biggest Republican donor of the election cycle spent $7.6 million to support conservative candidates, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CPR). Just eight years later, casino mogul Sheldon Adelson and his wife, Miriam, donated $122 million to support GOP candidates, or more than 15 times as much.
Such massive expenditures are not limited to presidential races. The 2018 midterm election cycle was the first in history to see more than $1 billion in outside spending up from $69 million just four cycles earlier and $567 million in 2014, according to the CPR.
Super PACs quickly became the biggest outside spenders. In 2018, the House Republican-linked Congressional Leadership Fund spent $136 million, the Senate Democratic-aligned Senate Majority PAC spent $112 million and the Mitch McConnell-connected Senate Leadership Fund spent $94 million, according to the CPR.
- Demonstrators protest the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision outside the Capitol, Wash., D.C., Jan. 21, 2011.
Though both parties have raised and spent hundreds of millions in outside money and the Citizens United ruling has been criticized by both former President Barack Obama and Trump researchers at the University of Chicago, Columbia University and the London School of Economics and Political Science found that the rise of dark money has resulted in a huge advantage for Republicans in state legislature races, particularly in states with weak unions.
We find that Citizens United increased the GOPs average seat share in the state legislature by five percentage points. That is a large effect large enough that, were it applied to the past twelve Congresses, partisan control of the House would have switched eight times, the researchers wrote in a Washington Post op-ed. In line with a previous study, we also find that the vote share of Republican candidates increased three to four points on average.
The result has been a shift much further to the right in numerous state legislatures and an increase in ideological extremism, which was more prevalent among Democrats, according to the study. In the 2010 election, the first to see a massive upswing in outside money, Republicans captured two dozen state legislative chambers ahead of a game-changing nationwide gerrymandering effort, which made it harder than ever for Democrats to win back the seats they lost.
And the corruption is not merely limited to exploiting loopholes in the law. Obama warned in a State of the Union speech that the Citizens United ruling could lead to foreign interference in U.S. elections. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito could be seen mouthing the words, Not true. A Brennan Center report pointed out that a small wealthy group of Americans now wields more power than at any time since Watergate, while many of the rest seem to be disengaging from politics. FEC Commissioner Ann Ravel quit in 2017 over the state of campaign finance, writing in her resignation letter that our political campaigns have been awash in unlimited, dark money since the Citizens United decision. Most of the funding comes from a tiny, highly unrepresentative segment of the population, she wrote.
This is perhaps the most troubling result of Citizens United: in a time of historic wealth inequality, report author Daniel Weiner wrote, the decision has helped reinforce the growing sense that our democracy primarily serves the interests of the wealthy few and that democratic participation for the vast majority of citizens is of relatively little value....
More, https://truthout.org/articles/citizens-united-broke-our-democracy-one-decade-ago-it-never-recovered/
- Citizens United, The Anti- Democracy Decade, Workers & 2020, from Robert Reich.
elleng
(130,908 posts)over the 'airwaves.'
appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)The entire system seriously at risk. The Nixon-Vietnam era almost seems benign, but it wasn't of course.
Gutting the VRA, Voting Rights Act of 1965 also.
elleng
(130,908 posts)repugs working to destroy, education #1.
Golden Raisin
(4,608 posts)the Fairness Doctrine was eliminated.
appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,593 posts)a steady, downward slope for real democracy in the US. Basically that is my entire adult life...no wonder I am often depressed. I am a realist and it has realistically sucked politically and economically for most of my life. Thanks Ronny, you were the beginning of the end. Reagun appointed Kennedy to SCOTUS too.
CrispyQ
(36,469 posts)Take away the corporations Constitutional rights. The framers never intended for corporations to have Constitutional rights like We the People. Corporate lawyers used the 14th amendment to claim rights for corporations.
ReclaimDemocracy.org has a corporate personhood page with incredible reading.
appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)rwsanders
(2,603 posts)Article called "Meet the Corporation", but probably everything you already knew.
https://vault.sierraclub.org/sierra/200509/corporation.asp
CrispyQ
(36,469 posts)alwaysinasnit
(5,066 posts)corruption.
mountain grammy
(26,621 posts)When he declared that racism was over. Worst umpire ever..Obama was so right to vote against his confirmation.
alwaysinasnit
(5,066 posts)Kaiserguy
(740 posts)Federalist Society for working to appoint judges with a clear right wing bias to the courts. What they have done should not even be legal. No group should be pushing to appoint bias judges to any court
Midnight Writer
(21,767 posts)then what is the point of even having a Judge?
Farmer-Rick
(10,175 posts)Written back in 1933 and banned in most facist countries even in the US.
It does involve repressed sexuality. It is an interesting read and can explain why the weirdos, filthy rich and poor, in the US are attracted to Traitor Trump and the facism they are creating.
erronis
(15,260 posts)Reich argued that the reason why German Fascism (Nazism) was chosen over Communism was that of increased sexual repression in Germany - as opposed to the somewhat more liberal (post-revolutionary) Russia. As children, members of the (German) proletariat learned from their parents to suppress nearly all sexual desire and - instead - expend the repressed energy into authoritarian idealism. Hence, in adults, any rebellious and sexual impulses experienced would cause fundamental anxiety and - therefore, instead - social control is used to reduce anxiety. Fear of revolt, as well as fear of sexuality, were thus "anchored" in the 'character structure' of the masses (the majority). This influenced the irrationality of the 'people' and allowed (irrational) 'populistic' ideology to flourish, Reich argued:[5]
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)but Citizens United finished the job, for sure.
appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)of 1965 as well.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)VRA was just as important as the other two. It allowed the return of Jim Crow. In one way of thinking ending the Fairness Doctrine allowed the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity to get the working class white people to leave the Democratic party, Citizens United put people like the Koch Brothers and Shel Adelson (and Vlad Putin) in charge of our elections, and getting rid of the VRA allowed them to disenfranchise black and brown people at will. The perfect trifecta to usher in a new era of rule by old white men.
Bluepinky
(2,270 posts)This decision occurred prior to Citizens United, the Iraq War/Invasion and appointment of several of our worst Supreme Court justices. I wonder how different our country might be had the Supreme Court not appointed George W. Bush the President at that time. Had the vote recounting in Florida been able to continue, we would have had President Al Gore, and we would be in a much different (and better) place today.
Farmer-Rick
(10,175 posts)And that nobody....Not even Gore....thought to protest their clearly undemocratic decision was amazing. It was as if we were in a democracy one moment and in a dictatorship of 9 justices the next. Truely an oligarchy inspiring moment.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)Great article & thread.
Went on a short tear a couple of days ago:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=12822575