Where a citizenship question could cause the census to miss millions of Hispanics
Source: Washington Post
Where a citizenship question could cause the census to miss millions of Hispanics
And why thats a big deal
By Ted Mellnik and Kate Rabinowitz July 4
The Justice Department said Wednesday they would continue to look for a way to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census, reversing their decision from just one day prior, after a tweet from President Trump. A fraction of the nations population is already asked that question each year in the Census Bureaus American Community Survey.
Hispanics with no citizenship answer on the 2017 American Community Survey
In the latest ACS, in 2017, the citizenship question went unanswered by about 1 in 12 Hispanics, a far higher rate than that of whites. Where these non-responses occurred can tell us where millions of Hispanics would probably be missed if the same question were added to the 2020 Census.
Hispanics from Mexico and Central America, areas targeted by the Trump administrations immigration policies, were most likely to skip the citizenship question, so their neighborhoods would be most affected by the undercount.
The question is simple: Is this person a citizen of the United States?
But those words would lead to a 2020 undercount of 6 million Hispanics, or about 12 percent of the Hispanic population, according to a study published this spring by Harvards Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/06/06/where-citizenship-question-could-cause-census-miss-millions-hispanics-why-thats-big-deal/
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)The Republican census will focus on POCs.
I don't think the question will be on the 2020 census tho. I also believe the red states will lose lots of money and gerrymandering will backfire.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)will cause many not to even fill out a census form.
Igel
(35,320 posts)on right and left, few mention anybody but Latinos. Little talk of Europeans. Yet less talk about Asians of various geographic persuasions.
Most of the talk hasn't been on the political right, either.
I mean, look at the OP. Which group is considered important can be said given which group gets the most consideration.
It was like with DACA. You look at the numbers, and DACA recipients are mostly Latino, mostly over 22, mostly not in college or college-bound. But when DACA was in the news, you saw mostly those under 22, and when the dispute revved up in earnest suddenly bright non-Latino college students (esp. is professional programs) were front and center. It's partly politics, it's partly PR, although it's harder and harder to tell the difference.