Congress isn't just a co-equal branch. We're first among equals.
Last edited Sun May 12, 2019, 02:47 PM - Edit history (1)
Theres a reason the House and Senate were set out right after the words We the People.
by Jamie Raskin, a Democrat, represents Marylands 8th District in the U.S. House of Representatives and serves on the Judiciary and Oversight Committees. He is an emeritus professor of constitutional law at American Universitys Washington College of Law.
'Constitutional crisis looms, preceded by constitutional illiteracy and confusion, which now hang like a thick fog over Washington. President Trumps administration refuses to cooperate with any congressional investigations he disfavors, drawing a curtain over the executive branch and blockading our oversight work: His treasury secretary has declined to produce the presidents tax returns, as demanded by the House Ways and Means Committee under federal statute. His attorney general has refused to comply with a House Judiciary Committee subpoena for special counsel Robert Muellers unredacted report and the evidence underlying his findings, and he has ordered Justice Department official John Gore not to testify before the House Oversight and Reform Committee (without even bothering to assert a legal privilege). Trump is suing House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) for seeking documents from one of the presidents accounting firms. And the White House has directed former counsel Donald McGahn and other witnesses not to appear before Congress. Congress shouldnt be looking anymore, the president-king proclaims. This is all. Its done.
Oversight isnt the only area where the president thinks he can supersede and supplant Congress. He believes he can declare a national security emergency when lawmakers reject funding for his border wall and then reprogram money Congress has appropriated for other purposes to build the wall behind our backs. And despite the fact that his main job is to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, as the Constitutions Article II provides, he routinely sabotages the effective administration of the Affordable Care Act (by starving recruitment efforts and promoting junk plans) and encourages government officials at the border to violate the law on asylum seekers. All this falls outside of his constitutional power.
Whenever the president commits a new offense against the Constitution, one of my Democratic colleagues will inevitably rise on the House or Senate floor and implore the president to remember that we are a co-equal branch of government. This is a straightforward and intuitive concept: When our kids were little, my wife and I taught them that the separation of powers is like rock-paper-scissors. Sometimes this branch ends up on top, sometimes that branch wins but the three have equal weight. This analogy appeals to our sense of fairness, and there is a kernel of truth in the idea that each branch has its limits: Congress cannot pass laws that violate the Constitution and will be checked by the Supreme Court if it does; the president can recommend laws to Congress but cannot force their passage; and the courts interpret what the law means when there are conflicting views.
But this naive cliche is now the heart of our current troubles. Congress was never designed as, nor should it ever become, a mere co-equal branch, beseeching the president to share his awesome powers with us. We are the exclusive lawmaking branch of our national government and the preeminent part of it. We set the policy agenda, we write the laws, and we can impeach judges or executives who commit high crimes and misdemeanors against our institutions. As James Madison observed in the Federalist Papers, In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates. Congress is first among equals. . .
The three branches have different functions and different powers, and we operate in a dynamic relationship with one another. But the forward motion and energy must be provided by Congress, and Congress must protect our national values. For government to work as the Constitutions framers intended, lawmakers must assert our proper role. And that means we must lead.'
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/congress-isnt-just-a-co-equal-branch-were-first-among-equals/2019/05/09/e3caa552-7206-11e9-9eb4-0828f5389013_story.html?
mopinko
(70,141 posts)he is an articulate and expert spokesman for the constitution.
this is a good read.
elleng
(130,996 posts)Ya know he's my congress-critter!
Scarsdale
(9,426 posts)politicians are democratic representatives, aren't they? Name one gop member who could compose this explanation. Think of them, Graham,McConnell, Gowdy, Nunes, and so on. Have any of them ever made a profound, intelligent, knowledgeable essay such as this? Too busy spending Russian money, and kissing an orange arse.
LuvNewcastle
(16,847 posts)The government is going to come to a screeching halt and the economy will take a nosedive. We'll see who gets blamed for it come election time.