Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(13,786 posts)
Tue Nov 13, 2018, 09:51 AM Nov 2018

The curious grammar of police shootings

From https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/07/14/the-curious-grammar-of-police-shootings

The curious grammar of police shootings

By Radley Balko
July 14, 2014

You’re probably familiar with the weaselly way politicians tend to apologize when they’ve been caught red-handed. The most famous example is the use of the line, mistakes were made. Use of the passive voice in an admission of wrongdoing has become so common that the political consultant William Schneider suggested a few years ago that it be referred to as the “past exonerative” tense.

You’ll often see a similar grammatical device when a police officer shoots someone. Communications officers at policy agenies are deft at contorting the English language to minimize culpability of an officer or of the agency. So instead of . . .

. . . Mayberry Dep. Barney Fife shot and killed a burglary suspect last night . . .


You’ll see . . .

. . . last night, a burglary suspect was shot and killed in an officer-involved shooting.


...



More at link.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The curious grammar of po...