South Carolina Is Lobbying to Allow Discrimination Against Jewish Parents
Trump's America, say and do anything to please the most disgusting people in America.
The Trump administration is considering whether to grant a South Carolina request that would effectively allow faith-based foster care agencies in the state the ability to deny Jewish parents from fostering children in its network. The argument, from the state and from the agency, is that the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act should not force a Protestant group to work with Jewish people if it violates a tenet of their faith.
The case being made by South Carolina is an extension of the debate around RFRA, which is more commonly associated with discrimination against LGBTQ people, but by no means applies exclusively to that group.
If granted, the exemption would allow Miracle Hill Ministries, a Protestant social service agency working in the states northwest region, to continue receiving federal dollars while recruiting Christian foster families, which it has been doing since 1988, according to its website. That discrimination would apply not just to Jewish parents, but also to parents who are Muslim, Catholic, Unitarian, atheist, agnostic or other some other non-Protestant Christian denomination.
Miracle Hill covers Greenville, Pickens and Spartanburg counties, and its foster care services have becoming increasingly in demand as an opioid epidemic has torn through a generation of young parents. The fight over its policy has been written about in the local press and was first covered nationally by The Nation.
https://theintercept.com/2018/10/19/south-carolina-foster-parent-discrimination-miracle-hill-ministries/
elleng
(131,067 posts)DAMN THEM!
What the hell 'faith' is that?
unblock
(52,291 posts)and for some reason we're supposed to respect that.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)Exceptionalism to their religion, exceptionalism to their concept of who is and who is not worthy of recognition as a valued human being. Some may disagree with me, but I do not see how else you define this staunch position. It is ugly, retreating from ones humanity and sense of community and general welfare of the child.
elleng
(131,067 posts)unblock
(52,291 posts)somehow i'm thinking that there might be a bit more outrage if different religions were in different positions in the story....
elleng
(131,067 posts)Right, put those DAMNED irreligious ones in different positions, on their KNEES!
I'm getting ANGRY! Agnostic with Jewish upbringing, I can't tolerate this.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)They get to decide!
It is beyond tribal and creepy, I do hope they do not get away with this crap.
getagrip_already
(14,822 posts)This is EXACTLY what the crafters of religious freedom are after. The ability of the majority to legally discriminate based on their "faith", and all that entails.
Now SCOTUS won't let Catholics be labeled non-christian, but they will allow discrimination based on religious beliefs.
They want exclusive country clubs, and marina's, and social clubs. They don't want women or minorities or other religions around them, except maybe cleaning up, serving them, or being sex slaves/objects.
It is what they have always been after, and they haven't even tried to hide it!
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)wanted to hear. They've been working toward this "legitimacy" for a long time.
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)marybourg
(12,634 posts)from anti-discrimination laws. More to follow.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,871 posts)I live in SC and had not heard of this, and it sounded too ridiculous to be accurate.
Well, going down two links brings me to our Governor asking for the waiver on the grounds of religious freedom.
Im used to my State being a racist lunatic asylum but this is beyond the pale.
And, that asshole Governor is running for re-election and hes going to win.
I do hope that the courts wont allow this. Even deeply conservative judges would have trouble trashing the First Amendment with this absurd argument.