Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
47,000 Ticks on a Moose, and That's Just Average. Blame Climate Change.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/18/climate/moose-ticks.html47,000 Ticks on a Moose, and Thats Just Average. Blame Climate Change.
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
Oct. 18, 2018
The biggest number of winter ticks that Peter J. Pekins ever found on a moose was about 100,000. But that moose calf was already dead, most likely the victim of anemia, which develops when that many ticks drain a mooses blood. So it was probably a lowball estimate, because some of the ticks had already detached.
Between 2014 and 2016, Dr. Pekins counted ticks on moose calves at two locations in New Hampshire and Maine. He wanted to see how the moose were faring, given that climate change has been delaying snows arrival in New Englands winters.
The longer-lasting warmth gives the ticks a leg up as they glom onto the moose, their preferred hosts, in the fall. They then feed through winter and hop off in the spring to lay eggs.
With the help of a team that shoots nets from helicopters to catch and tag the calves with radio collars (a process that takes about 15 minutes for the moose and eschews the use of drugs), Dr. Pekins was able to track 179 moose calves. The average number of ticks he found on them was 47,371.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2601 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
47,000 Ticks on a Moose, and That's Just Average. Blame Climate Change. (Original Post)
dalton99a
Oct 2018
OP
If a politician doesn't believe in climate change, they should not be allowed to hold or run
democratisphere
Oct 2018
#1
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)1. If a politician doesn't believe in climate change, they should not be allowed to hold or run
for political office. Real Science Matters!
Perhaps the moose should be outfitted with heavy duty flea and tick collars or the like!
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)4. Perhaps the moose should run for office.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)5. Sounds like a great idea but I'm not sure we want to subject the moose
to the infestation within a political office.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)2. republican lies about climate change are dangerous
republican lies about climate change are dangerous
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)3. Kick and recommend for visibility. I read all
Climate change articles I can. The evidence is overwhelming that man made climate change is destroying enviorments at an astounding rate. So very depressing. Whatever chance we have to weather the storms ahead are found in the Democratic Party. The GOP has abandoned belief in science and the old men in charge of it dont give a rats ass for any future generations.
Its not dark yet but its getting there. We have to vote because literally our lives depend on it.
trusty elf
(7,398 posts)6. horrifying