Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(81,566 posts)
Fri Oct 19, 2018, 04:15 PM Oct 2018

47,000 Ticks on a Moose, and That's Just Average. Blame Climate Change.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/18/climate/moose-ticks.html

47,000 Ticks on a Moose, and That’s Just Average. Blame Climate Change.
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
Oct. 18, 2018

The biggest number of winter ticks that Peter J. Pekins ever found on a moose was about 100,000. But that moose calf was already dead, most likely the victim of anemia, which develops when that many ticks drain a moose’s blood. So it was probably a lowball estimate, because some of the ticks had already detached.

Between 2014 and 2016, Dr. Pekins counted ticks on moose calves at two locations in New Hampshire and Maine. He wanted to see how the moose were faring, given that climate change has been delaying snow’s arrival in New England’s winters.

The longer-lasting warmth gives the ticks a leg up as they glom onto the moose, their preferred hosts, in the fall. They then feed through winter and hop off in the spring to lay eggs.

With the help of a team that shoots nets from helicopters to catch and tag the calves with radio collars (a process that takes about 15 minutes for the moose and eschews the use of drugs), Dr. Pekins was able to track 179 moose calves. The average number of ticks he found on them was 47,371.


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
47,000 Ticks on a Moose, and That's Just Average. Blame Climate Change. (Original Post) dalton99a Oct 2018 OP
If a politician doesn't believe in climate change, they should not be allowed to hold or run democratisphere Oct 2018 #1
Perhaps the moose should run for office. Haggis for Breakfast Oct 2018 #4
Sounds like a great idea but I'm not sure we want to subject the moose democratisphere Oct 2018 #5
republican lies about climate change are dangerous Achilleaze Oct 2018 #2
Kick and recommend for visibility. I read all bronxiteforever Oct 2018 #3
horrifying trusty elf Oct 2018 #6

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
1. If a politician doesn't believe in climate change, they should not be allowed to hold or run
Fri Oct 19, 2018, 04:20 PM
Oct 2018

for political office. Real Science Matters!
Perhaps the moose should be outfitted with heavy duty flea and tick collars or the like!

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
5. Sounds like a great idea but I'm not sure we want to subject the moose
Sat Oct 20, 2018, 02:52 AM
Oct 2018

to the infestation within a political office.

bronxiteforever

(9,287 posts)
3. Kick and recommend for visibility. I read all
Fri Oct 19, 2018, 04:56 PM
Oct 2018

Climate change articles I can. The evidence is overwhelming that man made climate change is destroying enviorments at an astounding rate. So very depressing. Whatever chance we have to weather the storms ahead are found in the Democratic Party. The GOP has abandoned belief in science and the old men in charge of it don’t give a rat’s ass for any future generations.

It’s not dark yet but it’s getting there. We have to vote because literally our lives depend on it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»47,000 Ticks on a Moose, ...