The Lizza List: Ten Quotes on the Fate of Health Care
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/03/the-lizza-list-wrestling-with-severability.html
How did the final day of oral arguments at the Supreme Court about the Affordable Care Act go? Depends on your perspective. Whether or not the Court ultimately strikes down the individual mandate thats key to the law, its supporters had to be dispirited as they heard the justices wrestle with the question of severabilitythat is, whether or not the full law has to go if the mandate does. Below, the ten quotes that are key to understanding the days proceedings, taken from the transcript released by the Court. (For more, see The New Yorkers full coverage of this weeks arguments.)
1. Justice Sonia Sotomayor: We are not in the habit of doing the legislative findings. What we do know is that for those States that found prices increasing, that they found various solutions to that. In one instance, and we might or may not say that its unconstitutional, Massachusetts passed the mandatory coverage provision. But others adjusted some of the other provisions. Why shouldnt we let Congress do that, if in fact, the economists prove, some of the economists prove right, that prices will spiral? Whats wrong with leaving it toin the hands of the people who should be fixing this, not us?
2. Justice Antonin Scalia: All right. The consequence of your proposition, would Congress have enacted it without this provision, okay thats the consequence. That would mean that if we struck down nothing in this legislation but thewhat do you call it, the corn husker kickback, okay, we find that to violate the constitutional proscription of venality, okay? (Laughter.) When we strike that down, its clear that Congress would not have passed it without that. It was the means of getting the last necessary vote in the Senate. And you are telling us that the whole statute would fall because the corn husker kickback is bad. That cant be right. (N.B.: The so-called Cornhusker kickback was repealed by Congress only days after the Affordable Care Act was signed into law.)
3. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: There are so many things in this Act that are unquestionably okay. I think you would concede that reauthorizing what is the Indian Healthcare Improvement Act changes to long benefits, why make Congress redo those? I mean its a question of whether we say everything you do is no good, now start from scratch, or to say, yes, there are many things in here that have nothing to do frankly with the affordable healthcare and there are some that we think its better to let Congress to decide whether it wants them in or out. So why should we say its a choice between a wrecking operation, which is what you are requesting, or a salvage job. And the more conservative approach would be salvage rather than throwing out everything.
Read more
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/03/the-lizza-list-wrestling-with-severability.html#ixzz1qVXQlLRe