Stag Party-The GOP’s woman problem is that it has a serious problem with women-By Frank Rich
Stag Party
The GOPs woman problem is that it has a serious problem with women.
By Frank Rich
At the time, back in January in New Hampshire, it didnt seem like that big a deal, certainly nothing to rival previous debate flash points like 9-9-9 and Oops! But in retrospect it may have been one of the more fateful twists of the Republican presidential campaign. The exchange was prompted by George Stephanopoulos, who seemingly out of nowhere asked Mitt Romney if he shared Rick Santorums view that states have the right to ban contraception. Romney stiffened, as he is wont to do, and took the tone of a mens club factotum tut-tutting a member for violating the dress code. George, this is an unusual topic that youre raising, he said. I know of no reason to talk about contraception in this regard. The partisan audience would soon jeer the moderator for his effrontery.
...................
To believe that Romney will somehow depart from his partys misogyny in the White House, you have to believe that everything he has said about these issues during the primary campaign is a lie. You have to believe that the real Romney is the one who endorsed Roe v. Wade when he was running against Ted Kennedy in 1994, and that all the Etch A Sketching since then has been a transitory attempt to pander to his partys base. But a look at Romneys personal history suggests that the real Romney is the one before us nowthe sincere exponent of a deeply held faith whose entire top hierarchy is male and that still denies women the leadership roles that are bestowed on every Mormon male beginning at age 12. (At least blacks were finally granted full equality in the Church of Latter Day Saints in 1978.) The widely reported examples of Romneys own personal behavior in his church roles as ward bishop and stake president in the Boston area suggest that he had not only never questioned this ethos but completely internalized it. He seems impervious to vulnerable women in crisis and need beyond his own family.
In one of these incidents, he turned his back on a 23-year-old single mother, Peggie Hayes, who had been a Romney family friend and teenage babysitter, because she refused to obey his and the churchs preference that she give up a second, out-of-wedlock child for adoption. Even when Hayess baby underwent frightening head surgery nine months after birth, Mitt spurned her call to come to the hospital to confer a blessing on her child. A similar Romney episode originally surfaced in an anonymous first-person account published by a Mormon feminist journal, Exponent II, in 1990. A mother of four learned that she had a blood clot in her pelvis during a later, unexpected pregnancy, putting her own health and that of the fetus at risk. Romney visited the hospital where she lay helpless, hurt, and frightened, as she described it, only to tell her that as your bishop, my concern is with the child. The woman, who has recently identified herself as Carrel Hilton Sheldon, was enraged that he cared more about the eight-week possibility in her uterus than he did about herand that he offered judgment, criticism, prejudicial advice, and rejection at a time when she needed support from spiritual leaders and friends. In an interview with Ronald Scott, the author of a Romney biography published last year, Sheldon tried to be generous when looking back. Mitt has many, many winning qualities, she said, but at the time he was blind to me as a human being.
All of which is to affirm that George Stephanopoulos was addressing his question to the right candidate when he brought up the banning of contraception at that January debate. Santorum has always been completely candid about his view of women and their status; Romney was the one who had to be smoked out. Romney didnt take the bait, but even so, his record is clear, and, unlike the angry Santorum, he has the smooth style of a fifties retro patriarch to camouflage the reactionary content. In this sense, his war on women would differ from Ricksand Rushsonly in the way prized by GOP spin artists like Noonan and Matalin. He would never be so politically foolhardy as to spell out on-camera just how broad and nasty its goals really are.
MORE:
http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/gop-women-problem-2012-4/
grasswire
(50,130 posts)...and thanks to Frank Rich for exposing the ugly heart of Romney's misogyny. I didn't know that he was a "bishop" of the church who had actual power over women who were suffering.
Damn.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)dimbear
(6,271 posts)Well, he does believe in the LDS church as a major corporation. I give you that.
It's flattering to our country, tho, that when we finally at long last get a clergyman candidate, he's not some simple country parson but a real
high-class high-dollar bishop.
Bishop. Interesting word. It's from the Greek for "overseer." Overseer just like Simon Legree.
Really.
SamG
(535 posts)I hope this long yet fully worthwhile article gets wide attention and helps to wake up more men and women as to how dangerous a Romney Presidency would be for slightly over half of all Americans, women.