Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,329 posts)
Tue Dec 12, 2017, 02:29 PM Dec 2017

Arizona State University Thinks Expulsion is "Too Severe" a Punishment for Rape

(one does wonder what is hiding in the closets of those administrators)

Arizona State University Thinks Expulsion is “Too Severe” a Punishment for Rape


On March 31, Arizona State University student Brooke Lewis was raped by another student. Afterward, she reported the assault to the police, who are conducting an ongoing investigation, as well as ASU’s Title IX team—which found the assaulter responsible for sexual misconduct and called for his expulsion. In a rare instance, however, the university hearing board is arguing against its own institution’s advice.



Fibonacci Blue / Creative Commons

Calling Lewis’ rapist an essential member of a research team, the board declared that his 3.9 GPA is reason enough to excuse him for his behavior and let him continue to attend ASU; they ruled that being expelled for raping his classmate is “too severe” a punishment, and recommended instead that Lewis’ attacker receive a two-year suspension and be forced to take a course on sexual misconduct. The assaulter—who is being referred to as James—also pushed back against the Title IX administrator’s call for his expulsion. He appealed the university’s initial decision, arguing that the school had little evidence and calling Lewis’ claims “unsubstantiated allegations.” To no doubt make his misconduct seem out of character, James also thought it important to release a statement speaking to his support of women’s rights. “I am an advocate of gender equality, including equal opportunity, equal pay for equal work and access to essential, basic healthcare for women,” he wrote, warning seconds later, however, that “there is an over-compensation where the pendulum swings too far in the opposite direction and creates another injustice.”

College students nationwide know all too well that the pendulum isn’t swinging in that direction—especially at ASU. Jasmine Lester, founder of the university group Sun Devils Against Sexual Assault, noted in an email to Ms. that only 1.69 percent of reported cases of rape and sexual harassment—or 62 of 3,660 cases—were charged during the last full school year, “leaving thousands of reported sexual predators free to re-offend without consequence.” She added that ASU has a troubling history of inaction on this issue, tracing back at least five years and undoubtedly more. “ASU has been under federal investigation for violating Title IX since 2012,” Lester told Ms., “has been sued multiple times for protecting rapists and made national news for protecting faculty sexual predators in 2014.”

The landscape Lewis faces shows little signs of progress. Staff and administrators have mistreated her, according to reports from her peers, and the school has failed to provide her with adequate academic and mental health accommodations in the wake of her rape. “Even before Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos scaled back Title IX guidelines this year for handling instances of rape and sexual violence, students weren’t adequately protected from sexual assault on college campuses,” Michele Sleighel and Carmen Linero-Lopez, organizers for the Feminist Majority Foundation’s CHOICES Campus Leadership Program, told Ms. “Reporting, investigative and disciplinary processes are often confusing and inadequate, which can discourage students from coming forward. Now that the federal government has abandoned students who survive sexual assault on campuses, student leaders are making their voices heard as they demand protection for themselves and their communities.”

The final decision on James’s punishment is in the hands of Senior Vice President for Educational Outreach and Student Services, James Rund—who was given less than 20 business days to consider the appeal board’s recommendation and decide whether or not to uphold the university’s expulsion. (That leaves him, at time of publishing, with around a week to decide.) Lester’s group is spearheading a petition to Rund demanding that he expel Lewis’ attacker.

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2017/12/11/arizona-state-university-thinks-expulsion-severe-punishment-rape/

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

BlueAZure

(19 posts)
2. I tend to agree
Tue Dec 12, 2017, 09:26 PM
Dec 2017

I think their admission status should be put "on hold", and they should be automatically re-admitted right after complete ing their life sentence.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
4. As the old joke goes
Wed Dec 13, 2017, 09:33 AM
Dec 2017

The only guaranteed 100% cause for expulsion is not paying tuition on time... Everything else (and I do mean *everything*) is at least open for negotiation...

Orrex

(63,214 posts)
5. How many rapes does a 3.9 excuse?
Wed Dec 13, 2017, 01:30 PM
Dec 2017

If the rapist had raped a member of the board, or a daughter/sibling/wife of a member of the board, would he still be given the 3.9 waiver?

Orrex

(63,214 posts)
6. How about this:
Wed Dec 13, 2017, 01:36 PM
Dec 2017

If you're not going to expel that fucker, then put an ankle bracelet on him and bar him from coming within 500 yards of his victim.

Forbid him to have any social media contact with her.

Bar him from entering any residence owned or subsidized by the university.

Make him 100% responsible for the full balance of her tuition, even if he leaves the university voluntarily or otherwise.

Penalize his overall GPA by 1 or 2 or 3 points.

Withhold or drastically reduce any stipends or scholarships he's receiving from the university.

Register him in a publicly accessible campus registry of sex offenders.

I could go on...

Orrex

(63,214 posts)
10. That's me, fighting against progress
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 01:49 PM
Dec 2017

Here's two more luddite measures, while I'm at it:

Bar him from attending on-campus sports or sports-related functions, other than phys ed classes.

Bar him from entering any "student union" buildings or any other social venues on campus

If he rapes another victim, then fine the university $10M for failing to address a public health hazard


He made an effort to ruin his victim's life, so it's fitting that he should at least suffer some minor inconvenience as a result.

niyad

(113,329 posts)
11. personally, I think your ideas are very mild, and totally appropriate if the university insists
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 01:53 PM
Dec 2017

on keeping him around.

I would add one thing--he should be made to wear a body cam that he cannot turn off.

Orrex

(63,214 posts)
12. That might be a privacy concern if he has roommates/housemates or lives with his family
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 02:00 PM
Dec 2017

Not his privacy, because fuck him.

But his roommates might have grounds to object if they had nothing to do with it.

I like saddling him with some kind of tracker (the ankle bracelet mentioned above, or the like), though. It would be fair to give him some kind of visible indicator, too, as a warning to others.

Require him to wear a sign or banner identifying him as a rapist, and if he's found on-campus without it, then he's immediately subject to prison time with all other penalties remaining in effect (e.g., paying his victim's tuition, etc.)

niyad

(113,329 posts)
13. you are, of course, completely correct about the privacy concerns of his roommates, if any.
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 02:08 PM
Dec 2017

a BIG RED "R" on a banner or velcro'd onto all his clothing.

Orrex

(63,214 posts)
14. :thumbsup:
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 02:10 PM
Dec 2017

Having committed rape, he has proven himself to be a legitimate safety concern, and other potential victims have the right to be warned.

niyad

(113,329 posts)
9. amazingly, the university investigation (their title IX team) said he was a sexual assaulter, and
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 01:42 PM
Dec 2017

should be expelled. (and we know how seldom that happens!!0

I agree with you. the universities should NOT be doing criminal investigations.

milestogo

(16,829 posts)
15. Maybe the board should reserve judgment until they've all been raped.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 12:35 AM
Dec 2017

Then they can talk about appropriate punishment.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,193 posts)
16. Hopefully the criminal charges will be prosecuted
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 12:42 AM
Dec 2017

Then he can enjoy his 3.9 in JAIL and be a registered sex offender for life.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Arizona State University ...