Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Goodbye 1st Amendment?
Goodbye 1st Amendment: New Bill Seizes Assets of Anyone Who Plans or Participates in Protests that Disturb the Public Peace:Imagine having all your assets seized because you planned a peaceful protest that disturbed the peace? That could be a reality under SB1142, which just passed the Arizona state senate.
Under SB1142, Arizonas racketeering laws are expanding to include rioting. This gives the state government the right to criminally prosecute and seize the assets of everyone who planned a protest that turned violent and everyone who participated.
The bill also redefines what constitutes a rioter as any person who uses force or violence or threatens to use force or violence, if such threat is accompanied by immediate power of execution, which EITHER disturbs the public peace OR RESULTS IN DAMAGE TO THE PROPERTY OF ANOTHER PERSON.
The vote was 17-13. One of the 17 that voted for this, Sen. John Kavanagh, gave the following justification for this absurd, unconstitutional new law: You now have a situation where you have full-time, almost professional agent-provocateurs that attempt to create public disorder. A lot of them are ideologues, some of them are anarchists. But this stuff is all planned
I should certainly hope that our law enforcement people have some undercover people there. Wouldnt you rather stop a riot before it starts?
Who defines what is considered a violent protest?
Who determines what disturbs the public peace? Does profanity, shouting, or loud music constitute disturbing the peace?
Who determines what disturbs the public peace? Does profanity, shouting, or loud music constitute disturbing the peace?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1413 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Goodbye 1st Amendment? (Original Post)
LongTomH
Nov 2017
OP
C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)1. No more goose-stepping Tiki Torch parades??
This cuts both ways, nazi assholes.
louis-t
(23,295 posts)2. "Disturbing the public peace" is
whatever the dictator in charge says it is.
FirstLight
(13,360 posts)3. ...
On the one hand I am screaming... Hellno AYFKM!!
On the other I am speechless at watching our liberties eroded...slowly and surely
If I allow the speechless part to win, it's over.
If I keep my screaming silent inside, it's over.
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)4. Another thing to consider
If, say, Antifa or BLM decide to hold a demonstration and a few Trump supporters decide to go down there and smash a few windshields then haul ass before they get caught, SB1142 will allow the state to confiscate everything the Antifa/BLM people own.
Read Sinclair Lewis "It Can't Happen Here."