Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,025 posts)
Tue Oct 24, 2017, 02:50 PM Oct 2017

Eugene Robinson: Why are we in Niger, and why doesnt Congress know?

The Trump administration, its foreign policy largely shaped by military men, urgently needs to tell Congress and the American people what we’re doing in Niger — and where else we’re doing it.

Like most Americans, I had no idea that roughly 800 U.S. troops were deployed in the arid, landlocked West African nation, where four soldiers were killed in an ambush on Oct. 4. Much more troubling is the fact that many key members of Congress — including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York — were clueless as well.

“We don’t know exactly where we’re at in the world, militarily, and what we’re doing,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, a champion of the war against terrorism, said Sunday.

President Trump, you will recall, promised during the campaign to scale back military deployments overseas. Of course, he promised a lot of things he cannot or will not deliver on. But he has a duty to let Americans know to what ends U.S. military force is being used around the world — and where our troops are being sent into harm’s way. The weeklong focus on Trump’s phone call with the widow of one of the soldiers slain in Niger obscures the central question: Why were they there in the first place?

The Constitution gives Congress, and only Congress, the authority to declare war. U.S. troop deployments in Niger, Yemen, Somalia and many other countries — some we still may not know about — are being justified under umbrella laws, such as the 2001 authorization to use military force against al-Qaida, or even the 1973 War Powers Resolution.

http://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/robinson-why-are-we-in-niger-and-why-doesnt-congress-know/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=05b3d8cf2b-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-05b3d8cf2b-228635337

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eugene Robinson: Why are we in Niger, and why doesnt Congress know? (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2017 OP
t-rump's generals probably have more USA's troops in other parts of the world Iliyah Oct 2017 #1
Perhaps a new Trump tower with an Ivanka fashion gazebo is in the offing? struggle4progress Oct 2017 #2
When were they deployed to Niger? Thunderbeast Oct 2017 #3
It started increasing in 2013. Igel Oct 2017 #5
I sent a couple of care packages to soldiers in Niger months ago Skittles Oct 2017 #4
The Orange Bloviator doesn't know, either treestar Oct 2017 #6

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
1. t-rump's generals probably have more USA's troops in other parts of the world
Tue Oct 24, 2017, 02:52 PM
Oct 2017

and congress don't know. t-rump wants to be a dictator.

Thunderbeast

(3,417 posts)
3. When were they deployed to Niger?
Tue Oct 24, 2017, 08:06 PM
Oct 2017

We should probably find out if the decision to deploy without advising Congress happened on Trumps watch. I would not be surprised if this was going on for several years. The 9-11 authorization was used by Bush and Obama to counter Al-Quida and ISIS in many places.

Igel

(35,317 posts)
5. It started increasing in 2013.
Tue Oct 24, 2017, 08:56 PM
Oct 2017

It ramped up. When it got to the current number, I can't ascertain. But the difference of 50 or 100 is a trivial matter.

Congress was told. Graham was told. Schumer was told.

They just weren't paying attention because it wasn't important.

When the girls were kidnapped in Nigeria by Boko Haram, there was a Need. As with many other things, if there's a Need, the process is just a formality, a hindrance. And if Congress isn't going to step up to the plate with legislation, the executive will take charge and make sure the Need is met.

It's a horrible, horrible practice. And now it's a horrible, horrible precedent.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Eugene Robinson: Why are ...