Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Why Gorsuchs Alleged Sexist Classroom Comments Are So Troubling and Revealing
Source: Slate
On Monday, not long before the start of Senate confirmation hearings for Donald Trumps Supreme Court nominee Neal Gorsuch, NPR released a startling story: According to one of the judges former law students, Jennifer Sisk, Gorsuch once made an extraordinarily sexist classroom comment. Sisk alleges that in April 2016, Gorsuch interrupted our class discussion to ask students how many of us knew women who used their companies for maternity benefits, who used their companies toin order to have a baby and then leave right away.
Mark Joseph Stern Mark Joseph Stern
When few students raised their hand, Gorsuch reportedly became animated and said, Come on, guys. All of your hands should be up. Many women do this. He later added, in Sisks words, that companies have to ask these sort of questions at the interview so that companies can protect themselves. Sisk brought her concerns to two deans, but its unclear whether they ever spoke to Gorsuch.
What should we make of these remarks? Sympathetic lawyers may be tempted to dismiss them as a law school hypothetical gone terribly awry, an unfortunate pedagogical misstep. But I find them to be quite revealing. The comments may seem out of character for Gorsuch himself, whose clerks, colleagues, and students have largely praised as a respectful professional. But they are not out of line with Gorsuchs own opinions, which devalue the profound, constitutionally protected connection between womens individual autonomy and economic equality. Gorsuch has already admitted that he holds corporations religious freedom in higher esteem then womens liberty. So it is not at all surprising to discover that he also values corporate interests over a womans right to be free from pregnancy discrimination.
The starting point of any discussion about reproductive freedom and economic equality is Planned Parenthood v. Casey, in which the court famously asserted that the ability of women to participate equally in the economic and social life of the Nation has been facilitated by their ability to control their reproductive lives. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made this declaration the centerpiece of her dissent in Hobby Lobby, in which the court allowed for-profit corporations to deny women access to contraception through health insurance plans that they helped to pay for. Ginsburg explained how the decision undermined a womans autonomous choice, informed by the physician she consults, to control her own body. Rather than allowing women to make decisions about their reproductive health, Hobby Lobby allowed corporations to insert themselves into this highly personal decision.
Read more: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2017/03/20/gorsuch_s_sexist_classroom_comments_are_troubling_and_revealing.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1915 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Gorsuchs Alleged Sexist Classroom Comments Are So Troubling and Revealing (Original Post)
demmiblue
Mar 2017
OP
dchill
(38,505 posts)1. "...so that companies can protect themselves."
Yes, those poor, underrepresented, unprofitable companies. The underlying bedrock of our ethical philosophy.
Nitram
(22,822 posts)2. FILIBUSTER!