Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,220 posts)
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 04:05 PM Mar 2017

House Repugs would let employers demand workers genetic test results -will be in NEW Plan!!

OMG--this is horrible! I hope all will call their Senators and Reps!!--and pass this around!!

The buzz talking words for Repugs and the new health plan is FREEDOM! I do not see this as FREEDOM!!-when you have to let your employer know your health stats!!




House Republicans would let employers demand workers’ genetic test results


https://www.statnews.com/2017/03/10/workplace-wellness-genetic-testing/?s_campaign=tw&utm_content=buffer1effa&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer


William Thomas Cain/Getty Images

By Sharon Begley @sxbegle

March 10, 2017



A little-noticed bill moving through Congress would allow companies to require employees to undergo genetic testing or risk paying a penalty of thousands of dollars, and would let employers see that genetic and other health information.

Giving employers such power is now prohibited by legislation including the 2008 genetic privacy and nondiscrimination law known as GINA. The new bill gets around that landmark law by stating explicitly that GINA and other protections do not apply when genetic tests are part of a “workplace wellness” program.

The bill, HR 1313, was approved by a House committee on Wednesday, with all 22 Republicans supporting it and all 17 Democrats opposed. It has been overshadowed by the debate over the House GOP proposal to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, but the genetic testing bill is expected to be folded into a second ACA-related measure containing a grab-bag of provisions that do not affect federal spending, as the main bill does.



“What this bill would do is completely take away the protections of existing laws,” said Jennifer Mathis, director of policy and legal advocacy at the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, a civil rights group. In particular, privacy and other protections for genetic and health information in GINA and the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act “would be pretty much eviscerated,” she said.

Employers say they need the changes because those two landmark laws are “not aligned in a consistent manner” with laws about workplace wellness programs, as an employer group said in congressional testimony last week.

Employers got virtually everything they wanted for their workplace wellness programs during the Obama administration. The ACA allowed them to charge employees 30 percent, and possibly 50 percent, more for health insurance if they declined to participate in the “voluntary” programs, which typically include cholesterol and other screenings; health questionnaires that ask about personal habits, including plans to get pregnant; and sometimes weight loss and smoking cessation classes. And in rules that Obama’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued last year, a workplace wellness program counts as “voluntary” even if workers have to pay thousands of dollars more in premiums and deductibles if they don’t participate.



Despite those wins, the business community chafed at what it saw as the last obstacles to unfettered implementation of wellness programs: the genetic information and the disabilities laws. ...............
.......................................

The 2008 genetic law prohibits a group health plan — the kind employers have — from asking, let alone requiring, someone to undergo a genetic test. It also prohibits that specifically for “underwriting purposes,” which is where wellness programs come in............................










Kevin? @SolidGraniteNH

Here is the complete list of those who want forced genetic testing @statnews @virginiafoxx @RepWalberg @RepStefanik @RepPaulMitchell #resist




12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Repugs would let employers demand workers genetic test results -will be in NEW Plan!! (Original Post) riversedge Mar 2017 OP
Well...how else will we know who's 1/32 moose-lamb ? CincyDem Mar 2017 #1
Any employer who demands such bullshit C_U_L8R Mar 2017 #2
Fantastic, we know the repug congress is on sth Motley13 Mar 2017 #3
IF passed Dan Mar 2017 #4
Uh, no. This allows them to offer a rebate on health insurance copays Warpy Mar 2017 #5
As the article points out-this has nothing to do with developing a Repug health plan-just a give riversedge Mar 2017 #8
The wellness thing was always a scam. Girard442 Mar 2017 #6
In my recent job greymattermom Mar 2017 #7
1984 is here!!! n/t John_Doe80004 Mar 2017 #9
Says the bill allows employers to REQuire genetic testing riversedge Mar 2017 #10
Sheesh, and I thought pee tests were out of line.... LakeArenal Mar 2017 #11
Subverting the rule of law with social policy disalitervisum Mar 2017 #12

C_U_L8R

(45,002 posts)
2. Any employer who demands such bullshit
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 04:10 PM
Mar 2017

is not worth working for and should be ashamed and boycotted by its customers.

Dan

(3,562 posts)
4. IF passed
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 04:14 PM
Mar 2017

then the day will come (quite soon I'm sure) when this will be part of the employment application process. Once identified with some "issue" then meaningful employment will be a dead issue for those with "medical/physical/psychological" concerns/potentials that can be identified.

This unfortunate group of people that are so identified - need to consider alternative life/employment choices. I suspect those choices will not be pretty for the people so identified and the ones that will be impacted by the alternative life/employment choices.

My opinion.

There is more going on - not sure, but things/actions by the GOP seem to be directed at identifying groups of people that could be considered disposable. I wonder, if this the beginning of the Fourth Reich ....

Warpy

(111,261 posts)
5. Uh, no. This allows them to offer a rebate on health insurance copays
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 04:17 PM
Mar 2017

if they allow themselves to be tested as part of an overall "wellness" campaign that identifies potential problems and allows the employee to develop healthy habits.

Yeah, sounds good, doesn't it? Nobody is actually forced to do this, but wages are low enough that some people will do it to reduce the ding from health insurance on their lousy paychecks.

The problem is that we're in the infancy of understanding the genome and we all know what's going to happen. Potential problems will be treated like actual problems and the poor sucker is going to find himself stuck paying higher and higher premiums in the future when he's not even sick.

We can't trust these assholes. If this thing passes, no matter how much you need that extra money every month, it's not worth it. Since they can't make it mandatory, don't do it. If you want to identify potential problems in your genome, have it run privately and anonymously. Yes, you can do that.

riversedge

(70,220 posts)
8. As the article points out-this has nothing to do with developing a Repug health plan-just a give
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 05:19 PM
Mar 2017

a way to business. Please call your Senators and Rep.

Girard442

(6,072 posts)
6. The wellness thing was always a scam.
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 04:31 PM
Mar 2017

Giving a discount to employees who attend, say, exercise classes is a backdoor way of charging those who can't more.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
7. In my recent job
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 04:42 PM
Mar 2017

the wellness thing is on line. Everyone I know makes up the answers to get the points. Are they going to send someone to watch you walk around your gated community every day?

 

disalitervisum

(470 posts)
12. Subverting the rule of law with social policy
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 12:53 AM
Mar 2017

Congress no longer makes law, it makes social policy disguised as law, gradually forcing a realignment of free people and society into ideological paths chosen by it's masters.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»House Repugs would let em...