Democrats introduce bill to take nuclear football out of Trump's hands
This is 3 weeks old, but I don't remember seeing anything about it on DU, and it's something many of us have been concerned about, so I am posting it. Good to know that at least this is being considered.
"Lawmakers introduced a bill in both houses of Congress Tuesday that would prevent the president from launching a nuclear first strike without a congressional declaration of war. A policy that was long debated but never seriously pursued during the Obama administration has now become anything other than abstract after the election of Donald Trump.
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) introduced legislation meant to pry the nuclear football out of the presidents hands.
(snip)
Lieu, who has a paper sign reading, Alternative Fact Free Zone outside his office, took aim at Trumps ignorance. It is a frightening reality that the U.S. now has a Commander-in-Chief who has demonstrated ignorance of the nuclear triad, stated his desire to be unpredictable with nuclear weapons, and as President-elect was making sweeping statements about U.S. nuclear policy over Twitter. Congress must act to preserve global stability by restricting the circumstances under which the U.S. would be the first nation to use a nuclear weapon.
The bill is backed by global disarmament groups and some former U.S. officials like William Perry, former secretary of defense. But its still to be seen if the Republican majority House or Senate would support a bill that could be seen to undermine a Republican president, particularly given that some have already pushed to authorize more presidential military force in the form of new AUMFs.
This isnt the first mention of such legislation the idea of it has been mentioned on and off for years, advocated by groups such as the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists. At a January event at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden said he is confident we can deter and defend ourselves and our allies against non-nuclear threats through other means, adding that he strongly believes that deterring and if necessary retaliating against a nuclear attack should be the sole purpose for the U.S. nuclear arsenal.
But its no longer academic. During the campaign, Trump made clear he had no idea what nuclear weapons the United States has, but flippantly suggested using them on the battlefield. He urged U.S. allies in Asia like Japan and South Korea to build their own nukes, reversing decades of U.S. policy. In December, Trump declared, Let it be an arms race with Russia. And while some read this as an invitation for Russia to team up with the United States against emerging nuclear powers, there is little chance that that could in turn lead to symmetrical nuclear disarmament, which Kremlin spokesperson Dmitri Peskov has already dismissed as totally unacceptable.
More:
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/24/senator-and-congressman-introduce-restricting-first-use-of-nuclear-weapons-act-trump/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/25/lawmakers-introduce-bill-to-take-nuclear-football-out-trumps-hands.html