Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,972 posts)
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 01:16 AM Jan 2017

Immigration Ban Is Unlikely to Reduce Terrorist Threat, Experts Say.

'Rarely does an executive order announce a more straightforward and laudable purpose than the one President Trump signed on Friday: “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States.” But the president’s directive is unlikely to significantly reduce the terrorist threat in the United States, which has been a minuscule part of the overall toll of violence since 2001.

Many experts believe the order’s unintended consequences will make the threat worse.

While the order requires the Department of Homeland Security to issue a report within 180 days providing detailed statistics on foreign nationals who commit acts of violence, terrorism researchers have already produced rich and revealing data. For instance, since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, no one has been killed in the United States in a terrorist attack by anyone who emigrated from or whose parents emigrated from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, the seven countries targeted in the order’s 120-day visa ban, according to Charles Kurzman, a sociology professor at the University of North Carolina.

Of Muslim Americans involved in violent extremism of any kind — for instance, charged with plotting terrorism or supporting a terrorist group — only 23 percent had family backgrounds in those countries, said Mr. Kurzman, who just published the latest of his annual studies of Muslim Americans and terrorism.

The larger point of experts is that jihadist attacks garner news attention that far outstrips their prevalence in the United States, and the president’s order appears to address not a rational calculation of risks but the visceral fears that terrorists set out to inflame.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/28/us/politics/a-sweeping-order-unlikely-to-reduce-terrorist-threat.html?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Immigration Ban Is Unlikely to Reduce Terrorist Threat, Experts Say. (Original Post) elleng Jan 2017 OP
Bannon strikes again Phoenix61 Jan 2017 #1
I think it will do the opposite world wide wally Jan 2017 #2

Phoenix61

(17,006 posts)
1. Bannon strikes again
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 01:23 AM
Jan 2017

I don't think I hate Twitler anymore. He can't help it that he's stupid and mentally ill. Bannon, on the other hand, is an evil, sick, twisted, piss poor excuse for a human being. He knows exactly what he is doing. May he rot in hell, sooner rather than later.

world wide wally

(21,744 posts)
2. I think it will do the opposite
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 01:31 AM
Jan 2017

And I will be really pissed off when he starts using US troops to guard his fucking hotels in the Middle East

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Immigration Ban Is Unlike...