Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The GSA Canceled a Planned Statement About Trumps Hotel-Lease Issue
By Jesse Singal
January 20, 2017
6:18 p.m.
As many have pointed out, one of the most glaring ethical and legal issues facing the newly inaugurated President Trump has to do with his beloved Trump International Hotel in the Old Post Office Pavilion, in Washington, D.C. Thats because language in the lease between the Trump company that is leasing the hotel and the General Services Administration, the agency that manages government-owned properties, explicitly states that No elected official of the Government of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of this Lease, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom[.]
The reasoning behind this clause, and why its particularly applicable to a case in which the elected official in question is the president, is simple. Since the property is owned by the federal government and managed by the GSA, for Trump to simultaneously be president and profit off the lease is a casebook example of both the appearance of a significant conflict of interest and an intolerable intermingling of an elected officials governmental duties and his familys personal financial interests, as two experts on legal issues pertaining to the GSA put it in a Government Executive article back in November. That is, Trump, given that the president chooses the head of the GSA, would get to both rent a building and be his landlords boss. The authors argued the GSA should immediately breach, or do whatever it takes, to end, the contract. (The watchdog group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility argued similarly in a complaint it filed today.)
That didnt happen, of course. Between Trumps election and today, the GSA had been mostly mum on this issue, insisting it didnt have enough information about how Trump was going to handle his business to make any sort of determination about the hotel lease, and suggesting it didnt want to before Trump took office and became an elected official, anyway. Yesterday, though, an agency spokeswoman indicated to Daily Intelligencer via email that the agency would be issuing a statement about the situation today, and confirmed I was on the list of recipients.
But nothing was ever sent out, and now a source at the GSA tells me that there is no statement forthcoming, instead pointing me to a January 11 blog post, which simply reiterates the point that the GSA was, at that time, seeking more information about Trumps business plans before coming to any sort of conclusion.
More:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/01/the-gsa-cancelled-a-planned-statement-on-trumps-lease-issue.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1541 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The GSA Canceled a Planned Statement About Trumps Hotel-Lease Issue (Original Post)
Judi Lynn
Jan 2017
OP
SunSeeker
(51,715 posts)1. GSA is now Trump's partner in crime. nt
alarimer
(16,245 posts)2. Chickenshits
Too afraid of him to do the right thing. We are going to see this over and over again.