Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 08:54 AM Mar 2012

Fair is Fair: For the sake of our communities, it's time to tax e-commerce


from OnTheCommons.org:



Fair is Fair
For the sake of our communities, it's time to tax e-commerce

By Jay Walljasper


In a recent blog I discussed how shoppers migrating to the Internet could mean curtains for many strip malls, big boxes and malls, but opportunities for downtowns and other traditional business districts that function as commons, not as monolithic retail destinations.

Now I want to raise the simple question of justice involved with this trend. Internet businesses are generally free from sales taxes, while brick-and-mortar stores must tack on 4-5-6-7-8 percent to each order—including many shops that enliven our neighborhoods while meeting our needs.

Any way you look at it, this is patently unfair—a government-sanctioned bribe to buy from Amazon instead of your local book dealer, e-Bay rather than that cool vintage store around the corner.

In tough times like these, a lot of independent businesses are already balanced precariously on the edge of insolvency, and a few more cents added to every dollar in sales might push them right over. .................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://onthecommons.org/fair-fair



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fair is Fair: For the sake of our communities, it's time to tax e-commerce (Original Post) marmar Mar 2012 OP
OR we could tax the rich instead of another regressive tax. aquart Mar 2012 #1
On the surface cbrer Mar 2012 #2
du rec. nt xchrom Mar 2012 #3
Agree KT2000 Mar 2012 #4
There is a constitutional problem with this meow2u3 Mar 2012 #5
 

cbrer

(1,831 posts)
2. On the surface
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:12 AM
Mar 2012

This argument makes a good case. However, if we can't first address more prevalent tax inequities, it may mean that many citizens can join the downward trend of small business. And besides that, I'm not at all convinced that those additional taxes would be directed towards easing the burden on local businesses. And that makes the case for not giving the current batch of politicians in DC any more money for anything.

Let's spend smarter. Not more.

KT2000

(20,577 posts)
4. Agree
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:39 PM
Mar 2012

Some are being taxed and others are not apparently. As a Washington state resident, I am taxed on transactions with businesses headquartered in the state. Since most that I do business with are now owned by Amazon - I pay sales tax most of the time. Our state government is funded by sales tax.

meow2u3

(24,764 posts)
5. There is a constitutional problem with this
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 07:19 PM
Mar 2012

Namely Article I, Section 9. No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any state.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei#section9

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Fair is Fair: For the sak...