Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 06:26 PM Feb 2012

The Myth of Lower Marginal Tax Rates

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/06/marginal_tax_charticle.html

Cutting taxes for the wealthy has become conservatives’ one, and often only, response to any economic problem. Just one problem: History doesn’t bear them out. Not at all.

The top marginal income tax rate has ranged all the way from 92 percent down to 28 percent over the last 60 years. With such a large range, it should be easy to see the enormous impact of lower rates on overall economic growth, as conservatives routinely claim. Years with lower marginal rates should boast higher growth, right?

That’s definitely not what happened. In fact, growth was actually fastest in years with relatively high top marginal tax rates. Back in the 1950s, when the top marginal tax rate was more than 90 percent, real annual growth averaged more than 4 percent. During the last eight years, when the top marginal rate was just 35 percent, real growth was less than half that.



<more>
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Myth of Lower Marginal Tax Rates (Original Post) Bill USA Feb 2012 OP
yup. they ignore that a cut in rates on gains is also an cut in the subsidy for losses unblock Feb 2012 #1
a very good good point. Bill USA Feb 2012 #2

unblock

(52,319 posts)
1. yup. they ignore that a cut in rates on gains is also an cut in the subsidy for losses
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 06:57 PM
Feb 2012

if a business proposition is profitable on a risk-adjusted basis, then it is very llikely to get done, whether its expectation is a $7mm profit or a $3mm profit.

and marginal tax rates don't change whether something's profitable or not. they only affect HOW profitable something is.

what marginal tax rates affect that DOES affect the decision is RISK. the higher the marginal tax rates, the LOWER the risk, because the smaller the difference between your net gain and your net loss.


if tax rates are near zero, the losses are nearly all yours, which might well deter you from making some decent business decisions. but if your marginal tax rate were 70%, uncle sam would be taking the lion's share of any losses, so you get give it a go without nearly as much worry about the downside.




moreover, if the business is successful, you can choose to reinvest and continue to grow, rather than take money out and get taxed at the high personal rates. again, an incentive to grow business with high marginal tax rates.



but that doesn't keep right-wingers from lying about the way things actually work. their game is to repeat whatever serves their purpose, regardless of the data.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Myth of Lower Margin...