Snippy Ivanka Trump Bolts From Hard Hitting Cosmo Interview To Be Anywhere Else At All
Who's afraid of the big bad ladymag?
Snippy Ivanka Trump Bolts From Hard Hitting Cosmo Interview To Be Anywhere Else At All
image:
Who can know what Ivanka Trump expected upon agreeing to an interview in Cosmopolitan that shed be asked questions like Is Donald Trumps childcare plan just great, or is it SUPER GREAT? or asked about whether or not she had ever eaten a donut off of a mans penis, or how she got a beach body so fast after her last child, or like, what she thinks this years it bag is. Whatever she thought, odds are she thought it would be a soft interview Cosmo being a ladymag and all! Ladies arent interested in hard-hitting political coverage, are they? No, that is for the fellas. OR IS IT? Senior Editor Prachi Gupta did what few who have attempted to interview a Trump have done tried to actually nail her down on some shit instead of smiling and nodding and pretending like what shes saying makes sense and isnt terrible.
Ivanka kicked off the interview by blatantly ignoring the first question posed to her Hillary Clinton released [aspects of] her plan over a year ago. Why did the Trump campaign wait so long to release this policy? and by saying that shes glad people have two plans they can choose from, and pivoting to talking about how important she thinks childcare is. In a typical Trump interview, this would be how things would continue, but it was not, and it wasnt.
Gupta immediately asked her about why the plan was only for mothers and, by the way (oh yeah and by the way DRUDGE SIREN), only for married mothers because single harlots who get knocked up can just go screw and Ivanka, I think, tried to suggest that this was SUCH a big step that they didnt want to discuss general parental leave just yet, even though Clintons plan includes it. When asked about how this applies to same-sex couples, Ivanka tried to present the plan in a soft, gauzy light: So its meant to benefit, whether its in same-sex marriages as well, to benefit the mother who has given birth to the child if they have legal married status under the tax code.
Oh, how lovely, were all supposed to think! They even included the lesbians! How very nice of them! But Gupta rained on her parade by asking if gay men would enjoy the same benefit if they adopted a child, and Ivanka was all like No, cause they dont need to recover and this is just for recovering, not like, bonding with your child or anything.
. . . .
Read more at http://wonkette.com/606606/snippy-ivanka-trump-bolts-from-hard-hitting-cosmo-interview-to-be-anywhere-else-at-all#SkgyvrM1GcG38OVg.99
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)Everything about these people is fake.
niyad
(113,323 posts)madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)RandySF
(58,884 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)To benefit from this "Con" childcare deduction, you must ITEMIZE your tax deductions, and they must exceed the standard deduction amount or you are forced to use the standard deduction allowance.
the MAJORITY OF TAXPAYERS use the standard deduction. Some have incomes so low, they don't have to file a return at all.
That leaves ONLY THE HIGHER INCOME EARNERS, those who really don't NEED it, to benefit from this new deduction.
The Con and his surrogates should be asked "Why isn't it a TAX CREDIT instead of a TAX DEDUCTION?
niyad
(113,323 posts)SeattleVet
(5,477 posts)are making my brain fry from the logical disconnect.
Jumbo shrimp
Military Intelligence
Hard Hitting Cosmo Interview
President tRump
niyad
(113,323 posts)although, to be fair, there have been excellent articles in cosmo over the years, even on politics.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)that's the nanny's job
niyad
(113,323 posts)with their offspring!!