The Big Boom: Nukes And NATO
Today, the danger of some sort of a nuclear catastrophe is greater than it was during the Cold War and most people are blissfully unaware of this danger.
-William J. Perry, U.S. Sec. Of Defense (1994-97)
Perry has been an inside player in the business of nuclear weapons for over 60 years and his book, My Journey at the Nuclear Brink, is a sober read. It is also a powerful counterpoint to the North Atlantic Treaty Organizations (NATO) current European strategy that envisions nuclear weapons as a deterrent to war: Their [nuclear weapons] role is to prevent major war, not to wage wars, argues the Alliances magazine, NATO Review.
But, as Perry points out, it is only by chance that the world has avoided a nuclear warsometimes by nothing more than dumb luckand, rather than enhancing our security, nukes now endanger it.
The 1962 Cuban missile crisis is generally represented as a dangerous standoff resolved by sober diplomacy. In fact, it was a single manRussian submarine commander Vasili Arkhipovwho countermanded orders to launch a nuclear torpedo at an American destroyer that could have set off a full-scale nuclear exchange between the USSR and the U.S.
There were numerous other incidents that brought the world to the brink. On a quiet morning in November 1979, a NORAD computer reported a full-scale Russian sneak attack with land and sea-based missiles, which led to scrambling U.S. bombers and alerting U.S. missile silos to prepare to launch. There was no attack, just an errant test tape.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/07/22/the-big-boom-nukes-and-nato/